Automated Measurement of 25-OH Vitamin D3 on the Roche Modular E170 Analyzer

被引:76
作者
Leino, Aila [1 ]
Turpeinen, Ursula [2 ]
Koskinen, Pertti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Chem, Turku, Finland
[2] Lab Womens Clin, HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1373/clinchem.2008.111732
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The first commercial direct automated immunoassay specific for 25-OH vitamin D, (25-OH-D(3)) was recently introduced for use on Roche Diagnostics immunoassay analyzers. We assessed the analytical performance of the Elecsys 25-OH-D(3) assay on a Roche Modular E 170 analyzer. METHODs: The Elecsys 25-OH-D(3) assay is a direct electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for human serum or plasma. It is a competitive assay in which the binding protein of vitamin D is inactivated during incubation. The assay employs a polyclonal antibody directed against 25-OH vitamin D(3) We compared the 25-OH-D(3) assay to assays performed with RIA, HPLC, and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: At concentrations of 48, 76, and 124 nmol/L, within-run CVs were 5.1%, 3.1%, and 7.1% and total CVs were 12.1%, 7.4%, and 10.6%, respectively. A comparison of Elecsys 25-OH vitamin D, with RIA yielded the regression equation: Elecsys = 1.114 x RIA - 6.15 (S(y vertical bar x) = 15.7 nmol/L; n = 163). The corresponding equation with HPLC was: Elecsys = 1.077 X HPLC + 5.442 (S(y vertical bar x) = 13.9 nmol/L; n = 67) and with LC-MS/MS: Elecsys 0.887 x LC-MS/MS + 5.046 (S(y vertical bar x) = 12.4 nmol/L; n = 64). Contrary to LC-MS/MS, with the cutoff of 50 nmol/L (deficiency vs normal), approximately 10% of samples were misclassified as normal with RIA and Elecsys. Plasma samples were observed to have markedly higher concentrations than serum samples. CONCLUSIONS: The Elecsys concentrations of 25-OH-D(3) were in good overall agreement with those determined with LC-MS/MS and RIA. However, large between-method variation was observed in individual patient samples. Use of serum rather than plasma is preferred owing to the higher results observed with plasma samples.
引用
收藏
页码:2059 / 2062
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans [J].
Armas, LAG ;
Hollis, BW ;
Heaney, RP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2004, 89 (11) :5387-5391
[2]   Vitamin D reinvented: Implications for clinical chemistry [J].
Beastall, Graham ;
Rainbow, Sandra .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 54 (04) :630-632
[3]  
BOULLION R, 1990, CALCIUM REGULATING H, P24
[4]   Estimates of optimal vitamin D status [J].
Dawson-Hughes, B ;
Heaney, RP ;
Holick, MF ;
Lips, P ;
Meunier, PJ ;
Vieth, R .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (07) :713-716
[5]   Vitamin D deficiency [J].
Holick, Michael F. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (03) :266-281
[6]   Editorial: The determination of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D: No easy task [J].
Hollis, BW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2004, 89 (07) :3149-3151
[7]   Determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum by HPLC and immunoassay [J].
Turpeinen, U ;
Hohenthal, U ;
Stenman, UH .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (09) :1521-1524