Overestimation of apoplastic Fe in roots of soil grown plants

被引:61
作者
Strasser, O [1 ]
Köhl, K
Römheld, V
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Pflanzenernahrung 330, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Plant Sci, Oxford OX1 3RB, England
关键词
apoplast; apoplastic root iron; iron efficiency; storage pool;
D O I
10.1023/A:1004650506592
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The concentration of apoplastic Fe in roots of soil-grown plants was determined in order to evaluate the possible significance of the root apoplast as storage pool for Fe. Roots were grown in membrane bags maintaining contact with the soil solution but without direct contact with the soil. It could be shown that the concentration of apoplastic Fe in roots grown in most soils was lower than 50 mg kg(-1) root dry matter. This concentration is much lower than previously reported from nutrient solution and soil-grown cultures (about 1000 mg kg(-1) dry matter). The concentration of apoplastic Fe in strategy I and strategy II plants was little affected by the different soils used. Direct contact of roots with soil led to soil contamination at the root surface and so to an overestimation of the apoplastic Fe pool. Soil contamination of roots grown in direct contact with soil was detected by measuring the soil markers Ti, Si and Al and was further shown by PIXE. In conclusion, the low concentration of apoplastic Fe in roots demonstrates that the root apoplast is less significant as storage pool for Fe than previously assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   EFFECT OF ROOT EXUDATES ON MOBILIZATION IN THE RHIZOSPHERE AND UPTAKE OF IRON BY WHEAT PLANTS [J].
AWAD, F ;
ROMHELD, V ;
MARSCHNER, H .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1994, 165 (02) :213-218
[2]   FREE SPACE IRON POOLS IN ROOTS - GENERATION AND MOBILIZATION [J].
BIENFAIT, HF ;
VANDENBRIEL, W ;
MESLANDMUL, NT .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 78 (03) :596-600
[3]  
BROWN D. A., 1955, SOIL SCI SOC AMER PROC, V19, P131
[4]   IRON-STRESS RESPONSE IN TOMATO (LYCOPERSICON-ESCULENTUM) .1. SITES OF FE REDUCTION, ABSORPTION AND TRANSPORT [J].
BROWN, JC ;
AMBLER, JE .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1974, 31 (03) :221-224
[5]  
CAMPBELL R, 1973, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, V5, P747, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(73)90019-9
[6]   TITANIUM DETERMINATION FOR CORRECTION OF PLANT-SAMPLE CONTAMINATION BY SOIL [J].
CARY, EE ;
GRUNES, DL ;
BOHMAN, VR ;
SANCHIRICO, CA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (05) :933-936
[7]   COMPARISON OF THE ABILITIES OF HYDROXAMIC, SYNTHETIC, AND OTHER NATURAL ORGANIC-ACIDS TO CHELATE IRON AND OTHER IONS IN NUTRIENT SOLUTION [J].
CLINE, GR ;
POWELL, PE ;
SZANISZLO, PJ ;
REID, CPP .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (06) :1158-1164
[8]  
FOSTER RC, 1981, NEW PHYTOL, V89, P263
[9]   DEVELOPMENT OF A DTPA SOIL TEST FOR ZINC, IRON, MANGANESE, AND COPPER [J].
LINDSAY, WL ;
NORVELL, WA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1978, 42 (03) :421-428
[10]   THE CHEMISTRY OF IRON IN SOILS AND ITS AVAILABILITY TO PLANTS [J].
LINDSAY, WL ;
SCHWAB, AP .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1982, 5 (4-7) :821-840