Misoprostol compared with methylergometrine for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a double-blind randomised trial

被引:47
作者
Amant, F [1 ]
Spitz, B [1 ]
Timmerman, D [1 ]
Corremans, A [1 ]
Van Assche, FA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Louvain, Belgium
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1999年 / 106卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08115.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the: efficacy and side effects of misoprostol, compared with methylergometrine, for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. Design A double-blind, randomised clinical trial of 200 women with apparently normal pregnancies. Setting University teaching hospital. Participants Two hundred women with apparently normal pregnancies. Methods After the baby had been born, all women received two capsules by mouth and the contents of an ampule by intravenous injection. Each woman only received one active product. The capsules contained either a total of 600 mu g misoprostol or placebo, and the ampule 200 mu g of methylergometrine or placebo. Main outcome measures Need for further oxytocic drugs, blood pressure, the presence of side effects, mean haemoglobin and haematocrit three days after delivery. Results Two hundred women completed the study (100 received methylergometrine and 100 misoprostol). Postpartum haemorrhage occurred in 4.3% of the methylergometrine group and 8.3% of the misoprostol group (P = 0.57). The need for further oxytocic drugs was 4.4% and 12.8% after methylergometrine and misoprostol, respectively (P = 0.065). One hour after the birth of the baby there was no difference in the mean systolic blood pressure (117 +/- 12 mmHg versus 115 +/- 11 mmHg) (P = 0.26) or the mean diastolic blood pressure (72 +/- 10 mmHg versus 71 +/- 11 mmHg for the groups receiving methylergometrine or misoprostal, respectively) (P = 0.97). The mean temperature in the misoprostol group rose to 37 degrees C, compared with 37 degrees C in the methylergometrine group (P < 0.0001). In the misoprostol group 34% developed fever (> 38 degrees C) compared with 3% in the methylergometrine group (P < 0.0001). Shivering (visual analogue score greater than or equal to 8) also occurred more often after misoprostol (42%) than after methylergometrine (8.5%) (P < 0.0001). The haemoglobin level (g/dL) on the third postpartum day was similar for bath groups (11.0 and 11.2 for methylergometrine and misoprostol, respectively) (P = 0.39). Conclusions This study suggests that although protection from postpartum haemorrhage using par enteral methylergometrine and oral misoprostol is nearly equal, misoprostol is associated with more side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1070
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ABOULEISH E, 1976, ANESTH ANALG, V55, P813
[2]  
Begley C M, 1990, Midwifery, V6, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0266-6138(05)80091-9
[3]   EFFECTS OF MISOPROSTOL ON HUMAN CIRCULATION [J].
BRECHT, T .
PROSTAGLANDINS, 1987, 33 :51-60
[4]   SERIOUS SIDE-EFFECTS OF ERGOMETRINE AND ITS USE IN ROUTINE OBSTETRIC PRACTICE [J].
BROWNING, DJ .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1974, 1 (24) :957-958
[5]  
Chong Yap Seng, 1997, Obstetrics and Gynecology, V90, P703, DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00275-5
[6]   MISOPROSTOL - DISCOVERY, DEVELOPMENT, AND CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS [J].
COLLINS, PW .
MEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1990, 10 (02) :149-172
[7]   Use of oral misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage [J].
ElRefaey, H ;
OBrien, P ;
Morafa, W ;
Walder, J ;
Rodeck, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (03) :336-339
[8]  
ElRefaey H, 1997, CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN, V9, P375
[9]   EARLY ABORTION INDUCTION BY A COMBINATION OF MIFEPRISTONE AND ORAL MISOPROSTOL - A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 DOSE REGIMENS OF MISOPROSTOL AND THEIR EFFECT ON BLOOD-PRESSURE [J].
ELREFAEY, H ;
TEMPLETON, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (09) :792-796
[10]   A comparative study using two dose regimens (200 μg or 400 μg) of vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation in first trimester nulliparae [J].
Fong, YF ;
Singh, K ;
Prasad, RNV .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (04) :413-417