The failure of years of experience with electrocardiographic transmission from paramedics to the hospital emergency department to reduce the delay from door to primary coronary intervention below the 90-minute threshold during acute myocardial infarction

被引:11
作者
Vaught, C
Young, DR
Bell, SJ
Maynard, C
Gentry, M
Jacubowitz, S
Leibrandt, PN
Munsey, D
Savona, MR
Wall, TC
Wagner, GS [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[3] Guilford Cty EMS, Greensboro, NC 27409 USA
[4] Moses Cone Mem Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Greensboro, NC 27401 USA
[5] LeBauer Healthcare, Dept Med, Greensboro, NC 27401 USA
关键词
paramedic; prehospital care; electrocardiographic transmission; emergency department; primary coronary intervention; acute myocardial infarction;
D O I
10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.12.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Emergency medical services (EMS), hospital emergency departments, and cardiologists have taken steps to reduce time to reperfusion therapy by implementation of aggressive acute myocardial infarction treatment and triage protocols. Data indicate that significant myocardial salvage requires reperfusion within 2 hours, and the current American College of Cardiology guideline is 90 minutes after hospital emergency department admission. Materials and Methods: To minimize delays in time to reperfusion in an urban-rural North Carolina County, Guilford County EMS and the Moses Cone Hospital have collaborated to implement transmission of EMS electrocardiographs (ECGs) to the emergency department. The study population included 92 patients who were transported by EMS and received primary coronary intervention during the second, third, and fourth years after initiation of this intervention in 1993. Results: The median time from symptom onset to the initial ECG was 77 minutes. There was an additional 23 minutes between the availability of this ECG and the arrival of the patient at the emergency department. In the first year of the intervention, the time from hospital arrival to percutaneous coronary intervention was 80 minutes. In years 2 through 4, they were 93, 85, and 94 minutes, respectively. In 2003, 10 years after the intervention, the time from hospital arrival to percutaneous coronary intervention was 113 minutes. Conclusion: Initial gains in the time from hospital arrival to percutaneous coronary intervention, attributed to acquisition of the ECG in the prehospital setting, were not sustained over 10 years. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 141
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1986, LANCET, V1, P397
  • [2] THE DIAGNOSTIC IMPACT OF PREHOSPITAL 12-LEAD ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY
    AUFDERHEIDE, TP
    HENDLEY, GE
    THAKUR, RK
    MATEER, JR
    STUEVEN, HA
    OLSON, DW
    HARGARTEN, KM
    LAITINEN, F
    ROBINSON, N
    PREUSS, KC
    HOFFMAN, RG
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1990, 19 (11) : 1280 - 1287
  • [3] Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: Reappraisal of the golden hour
    Boersma, E
    Maas, ACP
    Deckers, JW
    Simoons, ML
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 348 (9030) : 771 - 775
  • [4] Door-to-balloon time with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction impacts late cardiac mortality in high-risk patients and patients presenting early after the onset of symptoms
    Brodie, BR
    Hansen, C
    Stuckey, TD
    Richter, S
    VerSteeg, DS
    Gupta, N
    Downey, WE
    Pulsipher, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (02) : 289 - 295
  • [5] Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
    Brodie, BR
    Stuckey, TD
    Wall, TC
    Kissling, G
    Hansen, CJ
    Muncy, DB
    Weintraub, RA
    Kelly, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (05) : 1312 - 1319
  • [6] When should patients with acute myocardial infarction be transferred for primary angioplasty?
    Brodie, BR
    [J]. HEART, 1997, 78 (04) : 327 - 328
  • [7] CANNON CP, 1994, ACTA CARDIOL, V49, P1
  • [8] The physician's role in minimizing prehospital delay in patients at high risk for acute myocardial infarction: Recommendations from the National Heart Attack Alert Program
    Dracup, K
    Alonzo, AA
    Atkins, JM
    Bennett, NM
    Braslow, A
    Clark, LT
    Eisenberg, M
    Ferdinand, KC
    Frye, R
    Green, L
    Hill, MN
    Kennedy, JW
    KlineRogers, E
    Moser, DK
    Ornato, JP
    Pitt, B
    Scott, JD
    Selker, HP
    Silva, SJ
    Thies, W
    Weaver, WD
    Wenger, NK
    White, SK
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (08) : 645 - 651
  • [9] ELLIS S, 1996, 45 ANN SCI SESS AM C
  • [10] Impact of a public campaign on pre-hospital delay in patients reporting chest pain
    Gaspoz, JM
    Unger, PF
    Urban, P
    Chevrolet, JC
    Rutishauser, W
    Lovis, C
    Goldman, L
    Heliot, C
    Sechaud, L
    Mischler, S
    Waldvogel, FA
    [J]. HEART, 1996, 76 (02) : 150 - 155