POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy

被引:87
作者
Mohil, RS
Bhatnagar, D
Bahadur, L
Rajnessh
Dev, DK
Magan, M
机构
[1] Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll, Dept Surg, New Delhi, India
[2] Safdarjang Hosp, New Delhi, India
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4465
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) is a scoring system that is used widely to predict 30-day mortality and morbidity rates. The Portsmouth predictor modification (P-POSSUM) was developed to overcome the overprediction of mortality by POSSUM, especially in low-risk patients. In this prospective study, the validity of POSSUM and P-POSSUM was tested in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in a referral hospital of a developing country. Methods: Some 120 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy in a single unit were studied. Predicted morbidity and mortality rates were calculated by POSSUM and P-POSSUM equations using both linear regression and the exponential methods of analysis. These were compared with actual outcomes. Results: When the linear method of analysis was used POSSUM overpredicted morbidity, and there was a significant difference between the observed and predicted values (observed to expected (O:E) ratio 0-68). The prediction was more accurate when the exponential method was used (0: E ratio 0.91). POSSUM also significantly overpredicted mortality when analysed by the linear method (0: E ratio 0.39), but the prediction improved when exponential analysis was used (0: E ratio 0.62). Applying linear and exponential analyses for P-POSSUM, the O:E ratios for mortality were 0.66 and 0.88 respectively. Conclusion: If analysed correctly POSSUM is a good predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. P-POSSUM predicts mortality equally well. Both equations may be used for risk-adjusted surgical audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 503
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Evaluation of the POSSUM scoring system in lung surgery [J].
Brunelli, A ;
Fianchini, A ;
Xiume, F ;
Gesuita, R ;
Mattei, A ;
Carle, F .
THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 1998, 46 (03) :141-146
[2]  
COPELAND GP, 1991, BRIT J SURG, V78, P356
[3]   RISK-ADJUSTED ANALYSIS OF SURGEON PERFORMANCE - A 1-YEAR STUDY [J].
COPELAND, GP ;
SAGAR, P ;
BRENNAN, J ;
ROBERTS, G ;
WARD, J ;
CORNFORD, P ;
MILLAR, A ;
HARRIS, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (03) :408-411
[4]   The POSSUM system of surgical audit [J].
Copeland, GP .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (01) :15-19
[5]   COMPARATIVE AUDIT - FACT VERSUS FANTASY [J].
COPELAND, GP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (11) :1424-1425
[6]  
COPELAND GP, 1993, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V75, P175
[7]  
COPELAND GP, 2000, J CLIN EXCELLENCE, V2, P187
[8]  
Gotohda N, 1998, ACTA MED OKAYAMA, V52, P325
[9]   GOODNESS OF FIT TESTS FOR THE MULTIPLE LOGISTIC REGRESSION-MODEL [J].
HOSMER, DW ;
LEMESHOW, S .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS PART A-THEORY AND METHODS, 1980, 9 (10) :1043-1069
[10]   COMPARISON OF POSSUM WITH APACHE-II FOR PREDICTION OF OUTCOME FROM A SURGICAL HIGH-DEPENDENCY UNIT [J].
JONES, DR ;
COPELAND, GP ;
DECOSSART, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (12) :1293-1296