Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps

被引:153
作者
Church, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sect Endoscopy, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10350-003-0078-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Since the concept of "advanced" or "dangerous" adenomas was introduced in 1992, less concern has been directed to diminutive colorectal adenomas. They apparently confer no increased risk of metachronous colorectal cancer and some investigators have suggested that they need neither follow-up nor treatment. This study is intended to discover how often small colorectal adenomas have unfavorable histologic features. METHODS: Since 1995 the details of all colorectal polyps have been entered into a database, along with data concerning patients, symptoms, treatment, and outcome. Using this database all adenomas were categorized into three groups: Group I, <6 min diameter, Group II, 6 to 10 mm diameter, and Group III, >10 mm diameter. "High risk" adenomas were defined as those containing >25 percent villous architecture, those with severe dysplasia, and those over 10 min in size. Thus all Group III adenomas are high-risk by definition. The effects of family history, patient age, and polyp location on the proportions of Group I and Group II adenomas that were histologically high risk were examined. RESULTS: There were 5,722 polyps of which 4,381 (76.6 percent) were Group I, 666 (11.6 percent) were Group II, and 675 (11.8 percent) were Group III. These included 24 invasive cancers (2 in Group I, I in Group II, and 21 in Group III. Of the Group I adenomas, 91/2,064 (4.4 percent) were high risk compared to 65/417 (15.6 percent) in Group II. Of the 564 Group III adenomas, 326 (57.8 percent) had unfavorable histology. There was no effect of age, family history, or site of the polyp on the proportion of polyps that were high risk. CONCLUSIONS: Four percent of adenomas less than 6 mm diameter and 16 percent of those between 6 and 10 min have unfavorable histology. Small adenomas can still be clinically significant and should not be ignored.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 485
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] LONG-TERM RISK OF COLORECTAL-CANCER AFTER EXCISION OF RECTOSIGMOID ADENOMAS
    ATKIN, WS
    MORSON, BC
    CUZICK, J
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (10) : 658 - 662
  • [2] Bersentes K, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P1117
  • [3] EPIDEMIOLOGY, MANAGEMENT, AND PROGNOSIS OF MALIGNANT LARGE-BOWEL POLYPS WITHIN A DEFINED POPULATION
    CHANTEREAU, MJ
    FAIVRE, J
    BOUTRON, MC
    PIARD, F
    ARVEUX, P
    BEDENNE, L
    HILLON, P
    [J]. GUT, 1992, 33 (02) : 259 - 263
  • [4] SMALL COLORECTAL POLYPS - ARE THEY WORTH TREATING
    CHURCH, JM
    FAZIO, VW
    JONES, IT
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1988, 31 (01) : 50 - 53
  • [5] Diagnostic performance of virtual colonoscopy
    Dachman, AH
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 27 (03): : 260 - 267
  • [6] FENNERTY MB, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P496
  • [7] Future directions in CT colonography
    Fletcher, JG
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 27 (03): : 301 - 308
  • [8] GOTTLIEB LS, 1984, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V30, P143
  • [9] DIMINUTIVE COLONIC POLYPS - CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND MANAGEMENT
    GRANQVIST, S
    GABRIELSSON, N
    SUNDELIN, P
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1979, 11 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [10] Growth of colorectal polyps: Redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years
    Hofstad, B
    Vatn, MH
    Andersen, SN
    Huitfeldt, HS
    Rognum, T
    Larsen, S
    Osnes, M
    [J]. GUT, 1996, 39 (03) : 449 - 456