The validity of brief screening cognitive instruments in the diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia after first-ever stroke

被引:47
作者
Srikanth, V
Thrift, AG
Fryer, JL
Saling, MM
Dewey, HM
Sturm, JW
Donnan, GA
机构
[1] Menzies Res Inst, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Psychol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
stroke; cognition; dementia; screening tests; validity;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610205002711
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction: Brief cognitive tests such as the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) have been used to detect cognitive impairment and dementia in studies of stroke patients. However, there are few data on their validity for such use. We have evaluated their validity in detecting cognitive impairment not dementia (CIND) and dementia in a community-based sample of first-ever stroke patients. Methods: The standardized MMSE (S-MMSE) and the 16-item IQCODE were administered to 79 patients 1 year after a first-ever stroke. CIND and dementia were diagnosed independently using a comprehensive cognitive battery. The performances of the two tests were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Combined performance was evaluated when their scores were used in parallel (the "or rule"), in series (the "and rule") or as a weighted sum (the "weighted sum rule"). Results: Both tests were extremely poor at detecting CIND individually and in combination. For dementia, at traditional cut-points, the S-MMSE ( <= 23) was insensitive (0.50, 95% CI 0.16-0.84) and the IQCCDE ( >= 3.30) nonspecific (0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.75). An acceptable balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved for dementia using the "or rule" combination, but with only modest positive predictive value. Conclusions: The S-MMSE and the IQCODE were individually poor at detecting CIND and dementia after a nonaphasic first-ever stroke. The combination was useful in detecting dementia but it does not replace the need for detailed neuropsychological tests.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 305
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Mini Mental State Examination in geriatric stroke patients. Validity, differences between subgroups of patients, and relationships to somatic and mental variables
    Agrell, B
    Dehlin, O
    [J]. AGING-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 12 (06) : 439 - 444
  • [2] CLASSIFICATION AND NATURAL-HISTORY OF CLINICALLY IDENTIFIABLE SUBTYPES OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION
    BAMFORD, J
    SANDERCOCK, P
    DENNIS, M
    BURN, J
    WARLOW, C
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 337 (8756) : 1521 - 1526
  • [3] An evaluation of screening measures for cognitive impairment after stroke
    Blake, H
    McKinney, M
    Treece, K
    Lee, E
    Lincoln, NB
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2002, 31 (06) : 451 - 456
  • [4] MEASUREMENTS OF ACUTE CEREBRAL INFARCTION - A CLINICAL EXAMINATION SCALE
    BROTT, T
    ADAMS, HP
    OLINGER, CP
    MARLER, JR
    BARSAN, WG
    BILLER, J
    SPILKER, J
    HOLLERAN, R
    EBERLE, R
    HERTZBERG, V
    RORICK, M
    MOOMAW, CJ
    WALKER, M
    [J]. STROKE, 1989, 20 (07) : 864 - 870
  • [5] de Koning I, 1998, HAEMOSTASIS, V28, P158
  • [6] The CAMCOG: A useful screening instrument for dementia in stroke patients
    de Koning, I
    van Kooten, F
    Dippel, DWJ
    van Harskamp, F
    Grobbee, DE
    Kluft, C
    Koudstaal, PJ
    [J]. STROKE, 1998, 29 (10) : 2080 - 2086
  • [7] COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AFTER STROKE
    EBRAHIM, S
    NOURI, F
    BARER, D
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 1985, 14 (06) : 345 - 350
  • [8] Prevalence and severity of cognitive impairment with and without dementia in an elderly population
    Graham, JE
    Rockwood, K
    Beattie, BL
    Eastwood, R
    Gauthier, S
    Tuokko, H
    McDowell, I
    [J]. LANCET, 1997, 349 (9068) : 1793 - 1796
  • [9] THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [10] Cognitive impairment after stroke
    Haring, HP
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 79 - 84