Organizational research and the praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu

被引:103
作者
Everett, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Accounting, Fac Commerce & Econ, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1177/1094428102051005
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This commentary explores the assumptions, concepts, objectives, labels, and empirical techniques that underpin, guide, and characterize the research approach and methodology of Pierre Bourdieu. To further understand his approach and its applicability in the context of organization studies, Bourdieu's general project is contrasted with historical materialism and his view of power briefly compared to that of Foucault. Furthermore, Bourdieus concepts of field, capital, habitus, doxa, and symbolic violence, and his understanding of language are linked to current organizational literature and theory. His focus on relational analysis, "reflexivity," and what the author refers to as the "construction of the research object" are similarly discussed. Finally, there is a consideration of the role of the researcher and a brief discussion of the implications and limitations of a Bourdieun approach.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 80
页数:25
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER J., 1995, FIN SIECLE SOCIAL TH
[2]  
Alvesson M., 1996, COMMUNICATION POWER
[3]  
Alvesson M., 1992, CRITICAL MANAGEMENT
[4]   FORMS OF CAPITAL AND SOCIAL-STRUCTURE IN CULTURAL FIELDS - EXAMINING BOURDIEU SOCIAL TOPOGRAPHY [J].
ANHEIER, HK ;
GERHARDS, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1995, 100 (04) :859-903
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT J CONT SOCIOLOGY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, CURR PERSPECT SOC TH
[7]  
Barnard CI, 1938, FUNCT EXECUTIVE
[8]   THE SOCIAL SPACE AND THE GENESIS OF GROUPS [J].
BOURDIEU, P .
THEORY AND SOCIETY, 1985, 14 (06) :723-744
[9]   Understanding [J].
Bourdieu, P .
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 1996, 13 (02) :17-37
[10]   VIVE LA CRISE - FOR HETERODOXY IN SOCIAL-SCIENCE [J].
BOURDIEU, P .
THEORY AND SOCIETY, 1988, 17 (05) :773-787