Modeling evapotranspiration during SMACEX: Comparing two approaches for local- and regional-scale prediction

被引:143
作者
Su, HB [1 ]
McCabe, MF
Wood, EF
Su, Z
Prueger, JH
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Int Inst Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Natl Soil Tilth Res Lab, Ames, IA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/JHM466.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) model was developed to estimate land surface fluxes using remotely sensed data and available meteorology. In this study, a dual assessment of SEBS is performed using two independent, high-quality datasets that are collected during the Soil Moisture-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (SMACEX). The purpose of this comparison is twofold. First, using high-quality local-scale data, model-predicted surface fluxes can be evaluated against in situ observations to determine the accuracy limit at the field scale using SEBS. To accomplish this, SEBS is forced with meteorological data derived from towers distributed throughout the Walnut Creek catchment. Flux measurements from 10 eddy covariance systems positioned on these towers are used to evaluate SEBS over both corn and soybean surfaces. These data allow for an assessment of modeled fluxes during a period of rapid vegetation growth and varied hydrometeorology. Results indicate that SEBS can predict evapotranspiration with accuracies approaching 10%-15% of that of the in situ measurements, effectively capturing the temporal development of surface flux patterns for both corn and soybean, even when the evaporative fraction ranges between 0.50 and 0.90. Second, utilizing high-resolution remote sensing data and operational meteorology, a catchment-scale examination of model performance is undertaken. To extend the field-based assessment of SEBS, information derived from the Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) and data from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) were combined to determine regional surface energy fluxes for a clear day during the field experiment. Results from this analysis indicate that prediction accuracy was strongly related to crop type, with corn predictions showing improved estimates compared to those of soybean. Although root-mean-square errors were affected by the limited number of samples and one poorly performing soybean site, differences between the mean values of observations and SEBS Landsat-based predictions at the tower sites were approximately 5%. Overall, results from this analysis indicate much potential toward routine prediction of surface heat fluxes using remote sensing data and operational meteorology.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 922
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS [J].
Schaaf, CB ;
Gao, F ;
Strahler, AH ;
Lucht, W ;
Li, XW ;
Tsang, T ;
Strugnell, NC ;
Zhang, XY ;
Jin, YF ;
Muller, JP ;
Lewis, P ;
Barnsley, M ;
Hobson, P ;
Disney, M ;
Roberts, G ;
Dunderdale, M ;
Doll, C ;
d'Entremont, RP ;
Hu, BX ;
Liang, SL ;
Privette, JL ;
Roy, D .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 83 (1-2) :135-148
[32]   A comparative study of land surface emissivity retrieval from NOAA data [J].
Sobrino, JA ;
Raissouni, N ;
Li, ZL .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 75 (02) :256-266
[33]   The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes [J].
Su, Z .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (01) :85-99
[34]  
Su Z, 2001, J APPL METEOROL, V40, P1933, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1933:AEOTMF>2.0.CO
[35]  
2
[36]   Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland [J].
Twine, TE ;
Kustas, WP ;
Norman, JM ;
Cook, DR ;
Houser, PR ;
Meyers, TP ;
Prueger, JH ;
Starks, PJ ;
Wesely, ML .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2000, 103 (03) :279-300
[37]  
*USDA ARS HYDR REM, 2002, SOIL MOIST EXPT 2002
[38]  
WOOD EF, 2003, IEEE P IGARSS 03, V2, P1163
[39]   Mapping leaf area index through spectral vegetation indices in a subtropical watershed [J].
Xavier, AC ;
Vettorazzi, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (09) :1661-1672