Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics program

被引:16
作者
Garner, Jon
Porter, Alan L. [1 ]
Borrego, Maura [2 ]
Tran, Elizabeth [2 ]
Teutonico, Rita [3 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Tech, Technol Policy & Assessment Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Directorate Social Behav & Econ Sci, Natl Sci Fdn, Arlington, VA 22230 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Director Res Dev, Logan, UT 84322 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
interdisciplinary research indicators; human and social dynamics program; science overlay maps; research profiling; social network analysis; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY; POLICY; MAP;
D O I
10.1093/reseval/rvt001
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Research that integrates the social and natural sciences is vital to address many societal challenges, yet is difficult to arrange, conduct, and disseminate. This article analyses the cross-disciplinary character of the research supported by a unique US National Science Foundation program on Human and Social Dynamics (HSD). It presents evidence that research publications deriving from this support chiefly pertain to the Social and Behavioral Sciences, but extend widely into the Bio and Medical Sciences, Environmental Sciences, and Physical Sciences and Engineering. Integration scores, based on the diversity of references cited, indicate that the HSD-derived publications are notably more interdisciplinary than those of comparable programs. Diffusion scores, together with science overlay maps, show that uptake of the HSD publications extends into the natural, as well as social, sciences. Research networking analyses, together with a new composite mapping approach, point toward successful catalysis of a new research community. The measures and maps of cross-disciplinary research activity that are advanced here may prove useful in other research assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 144
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FAC INT RES
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT RES MANAGEMENT
[3]  
Bordons M, 2004, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH: THE USE OF PUBLICATION AND PATENT STATISTICS IN STUDIES OF S&T SYSTEMS, P437, DOI 10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_20
[4]  
Borrego M, 2010, REV HIGH EDUC, V34, P61
[5]  
Bromme R., 2000, PRACTICING INTERDISC, P115
[6]   A forward diversity index [J].
Carley, Stephen ;
Porter, Alan L. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 90 (02) :407-427
[7]  
Caruso D., 2001, Lead, follow, get out of the way: Sidestepping the barriers to effective practice of interdisciplinarity
[8]  
Chubin D.E., 1986, Interdisciplinary analysis and research
[9]   EXPERIMENTAL TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT - EXPLORATIONS IN PROCESSES OF INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM RESEARCH [J].
CHUBIN, DE ;
ROSSINI, FA ;
PORTER, AL ;
MITROFF, II .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1979, 15 (02) :87-94
[10]   THE HIERARCHY OF THE SCIENCES [J].
COLE, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1983, 89 (01) :111-139