Comparative angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy volunteers:: The importance of dosing

被引:71
作者
Maillard, MP [1 ]
Würzner, G [1 ]
Nussberger, J [1 ]
Centeno, C [1 ]
Burnier, M [1 ]
Brunner, HR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne Hosp, Div Hypertens & Vasc Med, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mcp.2002.121425
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objectives: We have reported previously that 80 mg valsartan and 50 mg losartan provide less receptor blockade than 150 mg irbesartan in normotensive subjects. In this study we investigated the importance of drug dosing in mediating these differences by comparing the AT(1)-receptor blockade induced by 3 doses of valsartan with that obtained with 3 other antagonists at given doses. Methods: Valsartan (80, 160, and 320 mg), 50 mg losartan, 150 mg irbesartan, and 8 mg candesartan were administered to 24 healthy subjects in a randomized, open-label, 3-period crossover study. All doses were given once daily for 8 days. The angiotensin II receptor blockade was assessed with two techniques, the reactive rise in plasma renin activity and an in vitro radioreceptor binding assay that quantified the displacement of angiotensin II by the blocking agents. Measurements were obtained before and 4 and 24 hours after drug intake on days 1 and 8. Results: At 4 and 24 hours, valsartan induced a dose-dependent "blockade" of AT(1) receptors. Compared with other antagonists, 80 mg valsartan and 50 mg losartan had a comparable profile. The 160-mg and 320-mg doses of valsartan blocked AT(1) receptors at 4 hours by 80%, which was similar to the effect of 150 mg irbesartan. At trough, however, the valsartan-induced blockade was slightly less than that obtained with irbesartan. With use of plasma renin activity as a marker of receptor blockade, on day 8, 160 mg valsartan was equivalent to 150 mg irbesartan and 8 mg candesartan. Conclusions: These results show that the differences in angiotensin II receptor blockade observed with the various AT(1) antagonists are explained mainly by differences in dosing. When 160-mg or 320-mg doses were investigated, the effects of valsartan hardly differed from those obtained with recommended doses of irbesartan and candesartan.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1910, J. Physiol., DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.1910.SP001386]
[2]   The new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, irbesartan - Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations [J].
Brunner, HR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1997, 10 (12) :311S-317S
[3]  
Burnier M, 2000, IDrugs, V3, P304
[4]   Angiotensin II receptor antagonists [J].
Burnier, M ;
Brunner, HR .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9204) :637-645
[5]   SALT-DEPENDENT RENAL EFFECTS OF AN ANGIOTENSIN-II ANTAGONIST IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS [J].
BURNIER, M ;
RUTSCHMANN, B ;
NUSSBERGER, J ;
VERSAGGI, J ;
SHAHINFAR, S ;
WAEBER, B ;
BRUNNER, HR .
HYPERTENSION, 1993, 22 (03) :339-347
[6]  
Chiolero A, 1998, Expert Opin Investig Drugs, V7, P1915, DOI 10.1517/13543784.7.11.1915
[7]   Valsartan: Preclinical and clinical profile of an antihypertensive angiotensin-II antagonist [J].
Criscione, L ;
Bradley, WA ;
Buhlmayer, P ;
Whitebread, S ;
Glazer, R ;
Lloyd, P ;
Mueller, P ;
deGasparo, M .
CARDIOVASCULAR DRUG REVIEWS, 1995, 13 (03) :230-250
[8]   CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ANGIOTENSIN-II RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST TCN-116 IN HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS [J].
DELACRETAZ, E ;
NUSSBERGER, J ;
BIOLLAZ, J ;
WAEBER, B ;
BRUNNER, HR .
HYPERTENSION, 1995, 25 (01) :14-21
[9]   Irbesartan - A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in the management of hypertension [J].
Gillis, JC ;
Markham, A .
DRUGS, 1997, 54 (06) :885-902
[10]   SC-52458, an orally active angiotensin II-receptor antagonist: Inhibition of blood pressure response to angiotensin II challenges and pharmacokinetics in normal volunteers [J].
Hagmann, M ;
Nussberger, J ;
Naudin, RB ;
Burns, TS ;
Karim, A ;
Waeber, B ;
Brunner, HR .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 29 (04) :444-450