Prognostic Significance of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes: Is UICC/TNM Node Classification Perfectly Suitable for Early Gastric Cancer?

被引:23
作者
Huang, Baojun [1 ]
Zheng, Xinyu [1 ]
Wang, Zhenning [1 ]
Wang, Meixian [2 ]
Dong, Yulan [2 ]
Zhao, Bo [3 ]
Xu, Huimian [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Surg Oncol, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Pathol, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R China
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Oncol Sci, New York, NY USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; PERINEURAL INVASION; INTERNATIONAL UNION; TNM CLASSIFICATION; 5TH EDITION; GASTRECTOMY; SUPERIORITY; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA; RATIO;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-008-0193-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Metastatic lymph node (MLN) is less frequently involved in early gastric cancer (EGC) and barely exceeds six in number. The prognostic value of the 5th edition of the UICC tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) node classification appears to be less accurate when applied to patients with EGC and needs to be further stratified. Three hundred twenty-three EGC patients were enrolled into this study. Prognoses of these patients were first assessed based on the 5th edition UICC TNM classification, followed by a reevaluation in which the prognoses of patients were further stratified according to the number of MLNs involved with an increment of one node at a time. A new node classification was proposed based on the correlation between prognoses and the number of positive nodes. According to the prognostic value, a new node classification was categorized as new N0 (0 MLN), new N1 (1-3 MLNs), new N2 (4-6 MLNs), and new N3 (> 6 MLNs). While the survival of N0 and N1 groups based on the 5th edition UICC TNM classification appeared to be homogeneous (p = 0.0947), significant difference was unmasked between the new N2 and new N0/N1 groups (p < 0.001). In addition, differentiation status, vessel involvement, and new node classification were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis for EGC. We conclude that subsets exist in patients with EGC at stage IB by UICC classification; patients with a parts per thousand yen4 MLNs are at higher risk of recurrence and surgical outcome in this population is relatively poor.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, AM JOINT COMMITTEE C
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT UNION CANC TNM C
[4]  
CELEN O, 2003, EUR J SURG S, V588, P33
[5]   Survival of early gastric cancer in a specialized European center. Which lymphadenectomy is necessary? [J].
Degiuli, Maurizio .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 30 (12) :2193-2203
[6]   The significance of perineural invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric carcinoma [J].
Duraker, N ;
Sisman, S ;
Can, G .
SURGERY TODAY, 2003, 33 (02) :95-100
[7]   Risk factors for lymph node metastases and their prognostic significance in early gastric cancer (EGC) for the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (IRGGC) [J].
Folli, S ;
Morgagni, P ;
Roviello, F ;
De Manzoni, G ;
Marrelli, D ;
Saragoni, L ;
Di Leo, A ;
Gaudio, M ;
ScD, ON ;
Carli, A ;
Cordiano, C ;
Dell'Amore, D ;
Vio, A .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 31 (10) :495-499
[8]   Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system [J].
Fujii, K ;
Isozaki, H ;
Okajima, K ;
Nomura, E ;
Niki, M ;
Sako, S ;
Izumi, N ;
Mabuchi, H ;
Nishiguchi, K ;
Tanigawa, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (05) :685-689
[9]   Evaluation of the necessity for gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for patients with submucosal invasive gastric cancer [J].
Gotoda, T ;
Sasako, M ;
Ono, H ;
Katai, H ;
Sano, T ;
Shimoda, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (03) :444-449
[10]   Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in early gastric cancer [J].
Gunji, Y ;
Suzuki, T ;
Hori, S ;
Hayashi, H ;
Matsubara, H ;
Shimada, H ;
Ochiai, T .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 20 (02) :148-153