Comparing the Meggitt-Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: inter-observer analyses

被引:47
作者
Santema, Trientje B. [1 ]
Lenselink, Ellie A. [2 ]
Balm, Ron [1 ]
Ubbink, Dirk T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Room G4-130,POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Med Ctr Haaglanden, Wound Expertise Ctr, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Diabetic foot ulcer; Inter-observer agreement; Meggitt-Wagner classification; University of Texas classification; Wound assessment; RELIABILITY; SCORE; RISK; SITE; PHOTOGRAPHS; POPULATION; VALIDATION; AMPUTATION; VALIDITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.12429
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100227 [皮肤病学];
摘要
Accurate classification of diabetic foot ulcers is essential for inter-clinician communication, assessment of healing tendency and determination of treatment options. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-observer agreement (IOA) of the most commonly used classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers; the Meggitt-Wagner (MW) and the University of Texas (UT) systems. In this study, 95 clinicians judged digital photographs of diabetic foot ulcers in various stages of healing. Wound depth was classified along the grades of the MW and the UT systems. IOA of the MW and UT systems was only moderate among the clinicians. This moderate agreement demonstrates that the MW and the UT systems appear not to be useful as single instrument and should always be used in combination with additional clinical information to avoid erroneous interpretations.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1141
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Comparison of four systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers in Tanzania [J].
Abbas, Z. G. ;
Lutale, J. K. ;
Game, F. L. ;
Jeffcoate, W. J. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2008, 25 (02) :134-137
[2]
[Anonymous], DIABET FOOT ANKLE
[3]
WOUND CLASSIFICATION IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN SITE OF ULCERATION IN THE OUTCOME OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS [J].
APELQVIST, J ;
CASTENFORS, J ;
LARSSON, J ;
STENSTROM, A ;
AGARDH, CD .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1989, 6 (06) :526-530
[4]
Validation of a diabetic wound classification system - The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation [J].
Armstrong, DG ;
Lavery, LA ;
Harkless, LB .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (05) :855-859
[5]
A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcers -: A prospective analysis of 1,000 patients [J].
Beckert, S ;
Witte, M ;
Wicke, C ;
Königsrainer, A ;
Coerper, S .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (05) :988-992
[6]
Are digital photographs reliable to assess donor site scars? An inter-method analysis and validity testing [J].
Brolmann, Fleur E. ;
Eskes, Anne M. ;
van de Kar, Annekatrien L. ;
van der Horst, Chantal M. ;
Niessen, Frank B. ;
Lindeboom, Robert ;
Vermeulen, Hester ;
Ubbink, Dirk T. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2013, 66 (11) :1632-1635
[7]
Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs [J].
Defloor, T ;
Schoonhoven, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2004, 13 (08) :952-959
[8]
Gul Asma, 2006, J Pak Med Assoc, V56, P444
[9]
The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot lesions in a UK population with diabetes [J].
Ince, P. ;
Kendrick, D. ;
Game, F. ;
Jeffcoate, W. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2007, 24 (09) :977-981
[10]
Inspectie voor de gezondheidszorg Ministerie van Volksgezondheid Welzijn en Sport, 2014, KWAL BAS ZIEK