Predictive value of the modified Early Warning Score in a Turkish emergency department

被引:78
作者
Armagan, Erol [1 ]
Yimaz, Yusuf [2 ]
Olmez, Omer Fatih [2 ]
Simsek, Gozde [1 ]
Gul, Cuma Bulent [2 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Uludag Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Bursa, Turkey
关键词
emergency; nursing; risk screening; triage;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283034222
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective The modified Early Warning Score (mEWS) is a triage instrument that promises to predict patient disposition and clinical outcome in emergency departments (EDs). We investigated whether mEWS can predict death, hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital deaths in a Turkish setting. Methods We conducted an ED-based prospective study of 309 patients who presented to an academic medical center. The mEWS was recorded in all patients on ED admission. A mEWS >4 was used to define patients at high-risk for the study outcomes. Results Patients categorized as being at high-risk either were admitted to ICU (n = 23) or to hospital (n = 37) 56.6% of the time, or died in ED (n = 16) or in hospital (n = 29) 42.4% of the time. Patients categorized as being at low-risk either were admitted to ICU (n = 25) or to hospital (n = 52) 37.4% of the time, or died in ED (n = 1) or in hospital (n = 4) 2.5% of the time. In multivariate regression analysis, patients with a mEWS of 5 or more were 1.95 times more likely to be admitted to ICU than those with a score less than 5. Patients with high-risk mEWS were 35 times more likely to die in ED and 14 times more likely to die in hospital than those presenting with a low-risk score. Conclusion We conclude that scores on the mEWS predict ICU admission as well as ICU and in-hospital deaths. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 15:338-340 (C) 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 340
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   The Simple Clinical Score predicts mortality for 30 days after admission to an acute medical unit [J].
Kellett, J. ;
Deane, B. .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 99 (11) :771-781
[2]   Evaluation of a risk score for interhospital transport of critically ill patients [J].
Markakis, C ;
Dalezios, M ;
Chatzicostas, C ;
Chalkiadaki, A ;
Politi, K ;
Agouridakis, PJ .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (04) :313-317
[3]   Long-term effect of introducing an early warning score on respiratory rate charting on general wards [J].
McBride, J ;
Knight, D ;
Piper, J ;
Smith, GB .
RESUSCITATION, 2005, 65 (01) :41-44
[4]   Triage in medicine, part II: Underlying values and principles [J].
Moskop, John C. ;
Iserson, Kenneth V. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 49 (03) :282-287
[5]   Use of the patient at risk scores in the emergency department: a preliminary study [J].
Rees, JE ;
Mann, C .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (06) :698-699
[6]   Identifying high-risk patients for triage and resource allocation in the ED [J].
Ruger, Jennifer Prah ;
Lewis, Lawrence M. ;
Richter, Christopher J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 25 (07) :794-798
[7]   Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: Implications for health policy [J].
Ruger, JP ;
Richter, CJ ;
Spitznagel, EL ;
Lewis, LM .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (12) :1311-1317
[8]   Validation of physiological scoring systems in the accident and emergency department [J].
Subbe, C. P. ;
Slater, A. ;
Menon, D. ;
Gemmell, L. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (11) :841-845
[9]   Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions [J].
Subbe, CP ;
Kruger, M ;
Rutherford, P ;
Gemmel, L .
QJM-MONTHLY JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS, 2001, 94 (10) :521-526
[10]   Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales [J].
Twomey, Michele ;
Wallis, Lee A. ;
Myers, Jonathan E. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (07) :477-479