Classification of disease subgroup and correlation with disease severity using magnetic resonance imaging whole-brain histograms: Application to magnetization transfer ratios and multiple sclerosis

被引:24
作者
Dehmeshki, J [1 ]
Barker, GJ [1 ]
Tofts, PS [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Neurol, London WC1N 3BG, England
关键词
histogram analysis; linear discriminant analysis; multiple sclerosis; principal component analysis;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2002.1000256
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper presents a new approach to characterize subtle diffuse changes in multiple sclerosis (MS) using histograms derived from magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) images. Two major parts dominate our histogram analysis; 1) Classification of NITR histograms into control and MS subgroups; 2) Correlation with current disability, as measured by the EDSS scale (a measure of disease severity). Two data reduction schemes are used to reduce the complexity of the analysis: linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and principal component analysis (PCA). LDA is better for the classification of MTR histograms as it takes into account the between-class variation. By using LDA, the space of NITR histograms is transformed to the optimal discriminant space for a nearest mean classifier. In contrast, PCA is useful for correlation with current disability as it takes into account the variation within each subgroup in its process. A multiple regression analysis is used to evaluate the multiple correlation of those principal components with the degree of disability in MS. This is the first application of such classification and correlation techniques to magnetic resonance imaging histogram data. Our MTR histogram analysis approach give improved classification success and improved correlation compared with methods that use traditional histogram features such as peak height and peak location.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 331
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
  • [2] Magnetisation transfer ratio histogram analysis of primary progressive and other multiple sclerosis subgroups
    Dehmeshki, J
    Silver, NC
    Leary, SM
    Tofts, PS
    Thompson, AJ
    Miller, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 185 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [3] DEHMESHKI J, 2000, P 1 INT WORKSH IM SI, P127
  • [4] Comparison of MS clinical phenotypes using conventional and magnetization transfer MRI
    Filippi, M
    Iannucci, G
    Tortorella, C
    Minicucci, L
    Horsfield, MA
    Colombo, B
    Sormani, MP
    Comi, G
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (03) : 588 - 594
  • [5] ESTIMATION OF CLASSIFIER PERFORMANCE
    FUKUNAGA, K
    HAYES, RR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1989, 11 (10) : 1087 - 1101
  • [6] IMAGE-ANALYSIS USING MATHEMATICAL MORPHOLOGY
    HARALICK, RM
    STERNBERG, SR
    ZHUANG, XH
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1987, 9 (04) : 532 - 550
  • [7] Hofman PAM, 1999, MAGN RESON MED, V42, P803, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199910)42:4<803::AID-MRM24>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-F
  • [9] Jackson JE, 1991, A user's guide to principal components
  • [10] KURTZKE JF, 1983, NEUROLOGY, V33, P1444, DOI 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444