Pre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viremia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

被引:78
作者
Strippoli, GFM
Hodson, EM
Jones, C
Craig, JC
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Ctr Kidney Res, NHMRC Ctr Clin Res Excellence Renal Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Bari, Nephrol Sect, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, I-70121 Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Herpes Virus Res Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Discipline Pediat & Child Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
preemptive treatment; cytomegalovirus infection; antiviral prophylaxis;
D O I
10.1097/01.tp.0000183970.71366.da
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Preemptive treatment with antiviral agents of patients with CMV viremia has been widely adopted as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive treatment in preventing symptomatic CMV disease. Methods. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of preemptive treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Two authors extracted all data; analysis was with a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. Ten eligible trials (476 patients) were identified, six of preemptive treatment versus placebo or standard care (treatment of CMV when disease occurred), three of preemptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis and one of oral versus intravenous preemptive treatment. Compared with placebo or standard care, preemptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (6 trials, 288 patients, RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (3 trials, 185 patients, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 176 patients, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative trials of preemptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant difference in the risks of CMV disease (2 trials, 151 patients, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.65), acute rejection (1 trial, 70 patients, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.09) or all-cause mortality (3 trials, 151 patients, RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.72). Conclusions. Few randomized trials have evaluated the effects of preemptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Preemptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care, but additional head-to-head trials are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of preemptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 145
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Brennan DC, 1997, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V8, P118
[2]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[3]   SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS - IDENTIFYING RELEVANT STUDIES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS [J].
DICKERSIN, K ;
SCHERER, R ;
LEFEBVRE, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6964) :1286-1291
[4]  
*EBPG EXP GROUP RE, 2000, NEPHROL DIAL TRAN S7, V15, P52
[5]   Prophylaxis for CMV should not now replace pre-emptive therapy in solid organ transplantation [J].
Emery, VC .
REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2001, 11 (02) :83-86
[6]  
Hartmann JT, 2000, ANN ONCOL, V11, P73
[7]   SYMPTOMATIC CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE IN THE CYTOMEGALOVIRUS ANTIBODY SEROPOSITIVE RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT TREATED WITH OKT3 [J].
HIBBERD, PL ;
TOLKOFFRUBIN, NE ;
COSIMI, AB ;
SCHOOLEY, RT ;
ISAACSON, D ;
DORAN, M ;
DELVECCHIO, A ;
DELMONICO, FL ;
AUCHINCLOSS, H ;
RUBIN, RH .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 53 (01) :68-72
[8]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[9]   Antiviral medications to prevent cytomegalovirus disease and early death in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Hodson, EM ;
Jones, CA ;
Webster, AC ;
Strippoli, GF ;
Barclay, PG ;
Kable, K ;
Vimalachandra, D ;
Craig, JC .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9477) :2105-2115
[10]   Clinical utility of quantitative cytomegalovirus viral load determination for predicting cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients [J].
Humar, A ;
Gregson, D ;
Caliendo, AM ;
McGeer, A ;
Malkan, G ;
Krajden, M ;
Corey, P ;
Greig, P ;
Walmsley, S ;
Levy, G ;
Mazzulli, T .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (09) :1305-1311