Reference Range for Intrapatient Variability in Blood-Pool and Liver SUV for 18F-FDG PET

被引:78
作者
Boktor, Raef R. [1 ]
Walker, Gregory [1 ]
Stacey, Roderick [1 ]
Gledhill, Samuel [2 ]
Pitman, Alexander G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St John God Hosp, Lake Imaging Dept Positron Emiss Tomog & Nucl Med, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Med Imaging & Radiat Sci Dept, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
SUV; blood pool and liver; intrapatient variability; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; SILLY USELESS VALUE; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.112.108530
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
F-18-FDG PET qualitative tumor response assessment or tumor-to-background ratios compare targets against blood-pool or liver activity; standardized uptake value (SUV) semiquantitation has artifacts and is validated by a stable normal-tissue baseline. The aim of this study was to document the normal intrapatient range of scan-to-scan variation in blood-pool SUV and liver SUV and to identify factors that may adversely affect it (increase its spread). Methods: Between July 2009 and June 2010, 132 oncology patients had 2 PET/CT scans. Patient preparation, acquisition, and reconstruction protocols were held stable, uniform, and reproducible. Mean SUV (body weight) values were obtained from 2-dimensional regions of interest in the aortic arch blood pool and in the right lobe of the liver. Results: Of the 132 patients, 65 had lymphoma. Their mean age was 62.5 y. The group's mean serum glucose level was 6.0 mmol/L at the first visit and 5.9 mmol/L at the second visit. The mean F-18-FDG dose was 4.1 MBq/kg at the first visit and 4.0 at the second. At the first visit, the group's mean blood-pool SUV was 1.55 (SD, 0.38); at the second, 1.58 (SD, 0.37)-not statistically different. The group's mean liver SUV was 2.17 (SD, 0.44) at the first visit and 2.29 (SD, 0.44) at the second (P = 0.005). Visit-to-visit intrapatient variation in blood-pool and liver SUVs had gaussian distributions. The variation in blood-pool SUV had a mean of 0.03 and SD of 0.42. The variation in liver SUV had a mean of 0.12 and SD of 0.50. Using 95th percentiles, the reference range in our patient population for intrapatient variation was -0.8 to 0.9 for blood pool SUV and -0.9 to 1.1 for liver SUV. Subanalysis by cancer type and chemotherapy suggested that the rise in liver SUV between the 2 visits was largely due to the commencement of chemotherapy, but no factors were identified as systematically affecting intrapatient variation, and no factors were identified as increasing its spread. Conclusion: In our patient cohort, the reference range for intrapatient variation in blood-pool and liver SUVs is -0.8 to 0.9 and -0.9 to 1.1, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 682
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of the Factors Affecting Accuracy of SUV Measurements [J].
Adams, Michael C. ;
Turkington, Timothy G. ;
Wilson, Joshua M. ;
Wong, Terence Z. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) :310-320
[2]  
Anderson H, 2010, Cancer Imaging, V10 Spec no A, pS68, DOI 10.1102/1470-7330.2010.9088
[3]   The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Visser, Eric P. ;
Willemsen, Antoon T. ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Zijlstra, Josee ;
Paans, Anne M. ;
Comans, Emile F. I. ;
Pruim, Jan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 (12) :2320-2333
[4]  
CHERUKURI S, 2003, P IEEE INT C PAR PRO, P423
[5]   Variability and reproducibility of hepatic FDG uptake measured as SUV as well as tissue-to-blood background ratio using positron emission tomography in healthy humans [J].
Kanstrup, Inge-Lis ;
Klausen, Thomas Levin ;
Bojsen-Moller, Jens ;
Magnusson, Peter ;
Zerahn, Bo .
CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2009, 29 (02) :108-113
[6]  
KEYES JW, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P1836
[7]  
Paquet N, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P784
[8]   Positron emission tomography in pulmonary masses where tissue diagnosis is unhelpful or not possible [J].
Pitman, AG ;
Hicks, RJ ;
Kalff, V ;
Binns, DS ;
Ware, RE ;
McKenzie, AF ;
Ball, DL ;
MacManus, MP .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2001, 175 (06) :303-307
[9]   Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in 18F-FDG PET [J].
Tylski, Perrine ;
Stute, Simon ;
Grotus, Nicolas ;
Doyeux, Kaya ;
Hapdey, Sebastien ;
Gardin, Isabelle ;
Vanderlinden, Bruno ;
Buvat, Irene .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (02) :268-276
[10]   Does chemotherapy influence the quantification of SUV when contrast-enhanced CT is used in PET/CT in lymphoma? [J].
Vera, Pierre ;
Ouvrier, Matthieu John ;
Hapdey, Sebastien ;
Thillays, Marc ;
Pesquet, Anne Sophie ;
Diologent, Brigitte ;
Callonec, Francoise ;
Hitzel, Anne ;
Edet-Sanson, Agathe ;
Menard, Jean Francois ;
Jardin, Fabrice ;
Tilly, Herve .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (12) :1943-1952