Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis

被引:181
作者
Schwebke, JR
Hillier, SL
Sobel, JD
McGregor, JA
Sweet, RL
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[2] UNIV PITTSBURGH,DEPT OBSTET GYNECOL & REPROD BIOL,PITTSBURGH,PA
[3] MAGEE WOMENS RES INST,PITTSBURGH,PA
[4] WAYNE STATE UNIV,SCH MED,DIV INFECT DIS,DETROIT,MI
[5] UNIV COLORADO,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,DENVER,CO 80262
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0029-7844(96)00233-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of vaginal Gram stain as interpreted by the Nugent criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, and to consider the use of Gram stain as the criterion standard for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Methods: A multicenter study was conducted of women attending gynecology or sexually transmitted disease clinics. Clinical data consisting of vaginal pH, ''whiff test,'' clue cells, and appearance of the vaginal discharge (Amsel criteria) were compared with the vaginal fluid Gram stain (Nugent criteria) for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the Gram stain compared with the Amsel criteria were 89 and 83%, respectively. There was significant variation in the specificity values by geographic site. If the Gram stain was considered the criterion standard for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, the sensitivity and specificity of the Amsel criteria were 70 and 94%, respectively. Conclusion: The vaginal Gram stain (Nugent criteria) is a sensitive method for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. The 83% specificity suggests that the currently used Amsel criteria may lead to the underdiagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 576
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   NONSPECIFIC VAGINITIS - DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA AND MICROBIAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASSOCIATIONS [J].
AMSEL, R ;
TOTTEN, PA ;
SPIEGEL, CA ;
CHEN, KCS ;
ESCHENBACH, D ;
HOLMES, KK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 74 (01) :14-22
[2]  
EASMON CSF, 1992, GENITOURIN MED, V68, P134
[3]   DIAGNOSIS AND CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS [J].
ESCHENBACH, DA ;
HILLIER, S ;
CRITCHLOW, C ;
STEVENS, C ;
DEROUEN, T ;
HOLMES, KK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (04) :819-828
[4]   BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS AND ANAEROBES IN OBSTETRIC-GYNECOLOGIC INFECTION [J].
ESCHENBACH, DA .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 16 :S282-S287
[5]  
Fleiss JL., 1981, MEASUREMENT INTERRAT
[6]  
FLEURY F J, 1981, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, V24, P407, DOI 10.1097/00003081-198106000-00008
[7]   CHARACTERISTICS OF 3 VAGINAL FLORA PATTERNS ASSESSED BY GRAM STAIN AMONG PREGNANT-WOMEN [J].
HILLIER, SL ;
KROHN, MA ;
NUGENT, RP ;
GIBBS, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (03) :938-944
[8]   Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant [J].
Hillier, SL ;
Nugent, RP ;
Eschenbach, DA ;
Krohn, MA ;
Gibbs, RS ;
Martin, DH ;
Cotch, MF ;
Edelman, R ;
Pastorek, JG ;
Rao, AV ;
McNellis, D ;
Regan, JA ;
Carey, JC ;
Klebanoff, MA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (26) :1737-1742
[9]  
Hulley SB, 2007, Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach, VFourth
[10]   IS TRICHOMONIASIS OFTEN ASSOCIATED WITH BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS IN PREGNANT ADOLESCENTS [J].
JAMES, JA ;
THOMASON, JL ;
GELBART, SM ;
OSYPOWSKI, P ;
KAISER, P ;
HANSON, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (03) :859-863