Identification of resynthesized |hVd| utterances:: Effects of formant contour

被引:115
作者
Hillenbrand, JM [1 ]
Nearey, TM
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Speech Pathol & Audiol, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Linguist, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.424676
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the role of formant frequency movements in vowel recognition. Measurements of vowel duration, fundamental frequency, and formant contours were taken from a database of acoustic measurements of 1668 /hVd/ utterances spoken by 45 men, 48 women, and 46 children [Hillenbrand etal., J. Acoust. Sec. Am. 97, 3099-3111 (1995)]. A 300-utterance subset was selected from this database, representing equal numbers of 12 vowels and approximately equal numbers of tokens produced by men, women, and children. Listeners were asked to identify the original, naturally produced signals and two formant-synthesized versions. One set of "original formant" (OF) synthetic signals was generated using the measured formant contours, and a second set of ''flat formant'' (FF) signals was synthesized with formant frequencies fixed at the values measured at the steadiest portion of the vowel. Results included: (a) the OF synthetic signals were identified with substantially greater accuracy than the FF signals; and (b) the naturally produced signals were identified with greater accuracy than the OF synthetic signals. Pattern recognition results showed that a simple approach to vowel specification based on duration, steady-state F-0, and formant frequency measurements at 20% and 80% of vowel duration accounts for much but by no means all of the variation in Listeners' labeling of the three types of stimuli. (C) 1999 Acoustical Society of America. [S0001-4966(99)04406-9].
引用
收藏
页码:3509 / 3523
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   DURATION AS A CUE IN RECOGNITION OF SYNTHETIC VOWELS [J].
AINSWORTH, WA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1972, 51 (02) :648-+
[2]  
ANDRUSKI J, 1992, J ACOUST SOC AM, V92, P390
[3]   VOWEL IDENTIFICATION - ORTHOGRAPHIC, PERCEPTUAL, AND ACOUSTIC ASPECTS [J].
ASSMANN, PF ;
NEAREY, TM ;
HOGAN, JT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1982, 71 (04) :975-989
[4]   SPECTRAL FORM AND DURATION AS CUES IN RECOGNITION OF ENGLISH AND GERMAN VOWELS [J].
BENNETT, DC .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1968, 11 :65-&
[5]   Natural Frequency, Duration, and Intensity of Vowels in Reading [J].
Black, John W. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1949, 14 (03) :216-221
[6]  
BLADON A, 1982, REPRESENTATION SPEEC, P95
[7]   MODELING THE JUDGMENT OF VOWEL QUALITY DIFFERENCES [J].
BLADON, RAW ;
LINDBLOM, B .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 69 (05) :1414-1422
[8]  
Carlson R., 1975, Auditory analysis and perception of speech, P55, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-248550-3.50008-8
[9]   VOWEL REPRESENTATION - SOME OBSERVATIONS ON TEMPORAL AND SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF THE 1ST FORMANT FREQUENCY [J].
DIBENEDETTO, MG .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1989, 86 (01) :55-66
[10]  
EDGINGTON ES, 1980, RANDOMIZATION TESTS