Using Random Group Resampling in multilevel research - An example of the buffering effects of leadership climate

被引:79
作者
Bliese, PD [1 ]
Halverson, RR
机构
[1] Walter Reed Army Inst Res, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[2] Halverson Consulting Inc, Chicago, IL 60304 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00104-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In this article, we provide a detailed example of how Random Group Resampling (RGR) can be used to empirically identify group effects with an example involving the buffering effects of leadership climate. RGR provides a tool for statistically determining whether group-level relationships are the result of true group phenomenon (group effects) or the result of aggregating individual data to the group level (grouping effects). Here, we present a group-level model of the stress-buffering hypothesis. Using this group-level perspective, we propose that the average perceptions of leadership climate within Army Companies will moderate the relationship between unit task significance and unit hostility. An unweighted group-means analysis revealed significant buffering effects. Following the unweighted group-means analysis, we used RGR to determine whether the significant interaction was a function of the aggregation process (grouping effects) or a function of the group-level properties of the data (group effects). The RGR analysis indicated that the interaction was related to the group-level proper-ties or the data, and was not merely a by-product of the aggregation process. We conclude by discussing the flexibility of RGR and use it to supplement a within and between analyses (WABAs). Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 68
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bliese P., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P349, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
[2]   Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation [J].
Bliese, Paul D. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (04) :355-373
[3]   Individual and nomothetic models of job stress: An examination of work hours, cohesion, and well-being [J].
Bliese, PD ;
Halverson, RR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 26 (13) :1171-1189
[4]   Group consensus and psychological well-being: A large field study [J].
Bliese, PD ;
Halverson, RR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 28 (07) :563-580
[5]  
BLIESE PD, 2000, UNPUB MULTILEVEL MOD
[6]  
BLIESE PD, 2000, UNPUB USING RANDOM G
[7]  
BLIESE PD, IN PRESS J OCCUPATIO
[8]  
COHEN S, 1985, PSYCHOL BULL, V98, P310, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.98.2.310
[9]  
Dansereau F., 1984, Theory Testing in Organizational Behavior: The Variant Approach
[10]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, V1st ed., DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593