A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: goals, team processes, and strategies

被引:133
作者
Hall, Kara L. [1 ]
Vogel, Amanda L. [2 ]
Stipelman, Brooke A. [1 ]
Stokols, Daniel [3 ]
Morgan, Glen [1 ]
Gehlert, Sarah [4 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, NIH, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[2] NCI, Clin Res Directorate, CMRP, SAIC Frederick Inc, Frederick, MD 21702 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Social Ecol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[4] Washington Univ, George Warren Brown Sch Social Work, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Transdisciplinary; Cross-disciplinary; Team science; Team-based research; Research process; HEALTH DISPARITIES; MENTAL MODELS; SCIENCE; WORK; MACROCOGNITION; TRANSLATION; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; CONFLICT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s13142-012-0167-y
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The complexity of social and public health challenges has led to burgeoning interest and investments in cross-disciplinary team-based research, and particularly in transdisciplinary (TD) team-based research. TD research aims to integrate and ultimately extend beyond discipline-specific concepts, approaches, and methods to accelerate innovations and progress toward solving complex real-world problems. While TD research offers the promise of novel, wide-reaching, and important discoveries, it also introduces unique challenges. In particular, today's investigators are generally trained in unidisciplinary approaches and may have little training in, or exposure to, the scientific skills and team processes necessary to collaborate successfully in teams of colleagues from widely disparate disciplines and fields. Yet these skills are essential to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of TD team-based research. In the current article, we propose a model of TD team-based research that includes four relatively distinct phases: development, conceptualization, implementation, and translation. Drawing on the science of team science field, as well as the findings from previous research on group dynamics and organizational behavior, we identify key scientific goals and team processes that occur in each phase and across multiple phases. We then provide real-world exemplars for each phase that highlight strategies for successfully meeting the goals and engaging in the team processes that are hallmarks of that phase. We conclude by discussing the relevance of the model for TD team-based research initiatives, funding to support these initiatives, and future empirical research that aims to better understand the processes and outcomes of TD team-based research.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 430
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Using team science to address health disparities: MacArthur network as case example [J].
Adler, Nancy E. ;
Stewart, Judith .
BIOLOGY OF DISADVANTAGE: SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND HEALTH, 2010, 1186 :252-260
[2]   SUSTAINING INTERVENTIONS IN COMMUNITY SYSTEMS - ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESEARCHERS AND COMMUNITIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 14 (06) :526-536
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Structures of scientific collaboration
[5]   Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance [J].
Austin, JR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :866-878
[6]   An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy [J].
Best, A ;
Stokols, D ;
Green, LW ;
Leischow, S ;
Holmes, B ;
Buchholz, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2003, 18 (02) :168-176
[7]   A Multi-Level Systems Perspective for the Science of Team Science [J].
Boerner, Katy ;
Contractor, Noshir ;
Falk-Krzesinski, Holly J. ;
Fiore, Stephen M. ;
Hall, Kara L. ;
Keyton, Joann ;
Spring, Bonnie ;
Stokols, Daniel ;
Trochim, William ;
Uzzi, Brian .
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (49)
[8]  
Boix Mansilla V., 2007, J HIGHER ED, V78, P215, DOI [10. 1353/jhe. 2007. 0008, DOI 10.1353/JHE.2007.0008]
[9]  
Borrego M, 2010, REV HIGH EDUC, V34, P61
[10]  
BRESLOW L, 1993, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V14, P585