Efficacy and safety of two different formulations of nifedipine (GITS) vs slow release microgranules in patients with mild and moderate hypertension

被引:5
作者
Botero, R
Aroca, G
Asa, G
González, M
机构
[1] Clin Medellin, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Clin Renal Costa, Barranquilla, Colombia
[3] Labs Leti Sav, Caracas, Venezuela
关键词
nifedipine; osmotic pump; microgranules;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jhh.1001364
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of nifedipine in two different formulations (osmotic pump and slow release microgranules) in patients with essential hypertension. A total of 91 patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension were recruited in a randomised, double-blinded trial, to receive a daily dose of 30 mg of nifedipine GITS or nifedipine slow release microgranules for 8 weeks. Patients who did not respond to the above-mentioned dose at week 4 of treatment received an increased dose of 60 mg per day of either drug for the remaining trial period. The primary end point of this study was the variation in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) from base-line values to the ones found at week 4 of treatment. The secondary end point was the variation in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP). Drug tolerability was measured according to incidence of side effects. The results were that both presentations reduced the mean SDBP and SSBP with similar efficacy. Drug side effects were also similar in both formulations. In conclusion nifedipine in slow release microgranules (NMG) Is as effective as osmotic pump nifedipine (GITS) in reducing blood pressure with a similar tolerability profile.
引用
收藏
页码:S156 / S160
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BRAWNWALD E, 1983, NEW ENGL J MED, V307, P1618
[2]   Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) [J].
Brown, MJ ;
Palmer, CR ;
Castaigne, A ;
de Leeuw, PW ;
Mancia, G ;
Rosenthal, T ;
Ruilope, LM .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) :366-372
[3]  
Chalmers J, 1999, J HYPERTENS, V17, P151
[4]  
Chung M, 1987, Am J Med, V83, P10, DOI 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90630-9
[5]  
COLL Y, 1993, EVALUACION FARMACOCI
[6]  
COLLET H, 1997, ARCH VEN FARM THERAP, V16, P78
[7]   CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS IN SYSTEMIC HYPERTENSION [J].
FRISHMAN, WH ;
CHARLAP, S ;
MICHELSON, EL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 58 (01) :157-160
[8]   CALCIUM ENTRY BLOCKERS IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION - CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE-PROSPECTS [J].
KAPLAN, NM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 262 (06) :817-823
[9]  
*LAB LET, 1997, INF TECN CIENT NUEV
[10]   RETARDATION OF ANGIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE BY NIFEDIPINE - RESULTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL NIFEDIPINE TRIAL ON ANTIATHEROSCLEROTIC THERAPY (INTACT) [J].
LICHTLEN, PR ;
HUGENHOLTZ, PG ;
RAFFLENBEUL, W ;
HECKER, H ;
JOST, S ;
DECKERS, JW .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8698) :1109-1113