Cost-utility analysis in evaluating prophylaxis in haemophilia

被引:16
作者
Carcao, M
Ungar, WJ
Feldman, BM
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Paediat, Div Haematol Oncol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Div Rheumatol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Div Populat Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Care Res Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
cost-utility analysis; health-related quality of life; haemophilia; pharmacoeconomics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1355-0691.2004.00879.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Prophylaxis is an expensive form of management in haemophilia but has demonstrated many advantages with respect to decreasing joint bleeds and potentially preventing joint damage. The valuation of prophylaxis and how the costs and benefits of this intervention compare with other interventions in the management of haemophiliacs can be evaluated through cost-utility analysis (CUA). CUA is an economic method of analysis where the benefits of a healthcare intervention are expressed as an overall utility or preference, usually in the form of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). This is a composite measure, which takes into consideration both an individual's lifespan and quality of life (QoL). The most difficult aspect of performing a CUA is the measurement of health-related QoL (HRQoL). Much work is ongoing into evaluating HRQoL in haemophiliacs. This paper addresses some of the ways in which this can be achieved and some of the problems with evaluating HRQoL. Ultimately CUA may provide a tool to allow societies to decide if prophylaxis is worth the cost and how the costs and benefits of prophylaxis compare to other healthcare interventions for other disease entities.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 57
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ): A User's Manual
[2]   A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states [J].
Badia, X ;
Roset, M ;
Herdman, M ;
Kind, P .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 21 (01) :7-16
[3]   A survey of factor prophylaxis in boys with haemophilia followed in North American haemophilia treatment centres [J].
Blanchette, VS ;
McCready, M ;
Achonu, C ;
Abdolell, M ;
Rivard, G ;
Manco-Johnson, MJ .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2003, 9 :19-26
[4]  
Bohn RL, 1998, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V79, P932
[5]   MEASURING PATIENT PREFERENCES - RATING-SCALE VERSUS STANDARD GAMBLE [J].
BOWE, TR .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (03) :283-285
[6]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[7]  
Brown Melissa M, 2003, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V14, P117, DOI 10.1097/00055735-200306000-00001
[8]   Health care economic analyses and value-based medicine [J].
Brown, MM ;
Brown, GC ;
Sharma, S ;
Landy, J .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 48 (02) :204-223
[9]   Preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) [J].
Brunner, HI ;
Maker, D ;
Grundland, B ;
Young, NL ;
Blanchette, V ;
Stain, AM ;
Feldman, BM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) :314-322
[10]  
CARLSSON N, 1993, EUR J HAEMATOL, V51, P247