A comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma

被引:104
作者
Wakelin, SJ
Deans, C
Crofts, TJ
Allan, PL
Plevris, JN
Paterson-Brown, S
机构
[1] Royal Infirm, Dept Surg, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Royal Infirm, Dept Radiol, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Royal Infirm, Ctr Liver & Digest Disorders, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
computerised tomography; laparoscopic ultrasound; endoscopic ultrasound; staging; oesophago-gastric cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00418-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction and objective: Oesophago-gastric carcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis despite advances in diagnosis and treatment. Accurate preoperative staging of gastro-oesophageal carcinoma is. therefore. essential in order to determine patient selection for potentially curative resection. The aim of this Study was to evaluate and compare the role of computerised tomography (CT), laparoscopic ultrasound (LapUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma. Methods and patients: Thirty-six patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the oesophagus or stomach who were considered fit for surgical resection were identified from a prospectively collected database. All patients underwent spiral CT, LapUS and EUS as part or their preoperative staging investigations. Results from the staging modalities were compared retrospectively with final histopathology where available and to intraoperative findings where the tumour was irresectable. Results: Locally advanced tumours (T3/T4) were accurately identified by CT in 15/16 (94%) and by EUS in 14/16 (88%). LapUS was unable to detect 11 tumours (of which five were T3/T4) because they were above the diaphragm, but in the locally advanced cases where the tumour could be seen the accuracy was 10/12 (83%,). EUS was the best modality for assessing early tumours and locoregional nodal involvement with accuracies of 8/13 (62%) and 21/29 (72%), respectively. EUS accuracies rose to 64, 92 and 83% for T1/T2, T3/T4 and N staging with the exclusion of those patients (n=6) in whom strictures prevented full assessment. LapUS had a specificity of 100% compared to 90%, for CT and was more accurate than CT for assessing distant metastases (accuracy of 26/32 (81%) compared to 23/32 (72%) for CT). Conclusions: Although this study is small it has confirmed that CT, EUS and LapUS act in a complimentary manner to provide the most complete preoperative staging for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 167
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ANDAKER L, 1991, SURGERY, V109, P132
[2]   Accuracy of laparoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of upper gastrointestinal malignancy [J].
Anderson, DN ;
Campbell, S ;
Park, KGM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (10) :1424-1428
[3]   ULTRASONIC ESOPHAGOPROBE FOR TNM STAGING OF HIGHLY STENOSING ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA [J].
BINMOELLER, KF ;
SEIFERT, H ;
SEITZ, U ;
IZBICKI, JR ;
KIDA, M ;
SOEHENDRA, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (06) :547-552
[4]  
Blazeby JM, 2000, CANCER, V88, P1781
[5]   PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF GASTRIC-CANCER - COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC US AND DYNAMIC CT [J].
BOTET, JF ;
LIGHTDALE, CJ ;
ZAUBER, AG ;
GERDES, H ;
WINAWER, SJ ;
URMACHER, C ;
BRENNAN, MF .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (02) :426-432
[6]   ENDOSCOPIC SONOGRAPHY OF THE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT [J].
BOTET, JF ;
LIGHTDALE, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 156 (01) :63-68
[7]   MALIGNANT ESOPHAGEAL STRICTURES - STAGING ACCURACY OF ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY [J].
CATALANO, MF ;
VANDAM, J ;
SIVAK, MV .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (06) :535-539
[8]  
Consigliere D, 1992, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V37, P113
[9]  
COOK AO, 1986, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V121, P603
[10]   Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging [J].
Davies, J ;
Chalmers, AG ;
SueLing, HM ;
May, J ;
Miller, GV ;
Martin, IG ;
Johnston, D .
GUT, 1997, 41 (03) :314-319