Tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets and codeine/acetaminophen combination capsules for the management of chronic pain: A comparative trial

被引:101
作者
Mullican, WS
Lacy, JR
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Evansville Ctr Med Educ, Evansville, IN USA
[2] Palo Alto Med Fdn, Dept Neurol, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
tramadol; acetaminophen; tramadol/acetaminophen; codeine/acetaminophen; osteoarthritis; back pain;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80118-1
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 [药学];
摘要
Background: Opioid/acetaminophen (APAP) combination analgesics are widely prescribed for the relief of moderate pain. Tramadol is a synthetic analgesic that has been shown to be effective both alone and in combination with APAP. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tramadol/APAP tablets with codeine/APAP capsules. Methods: This 4-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-control, double-dummy, multicenter trial compared tramadol/APAP (37.5 mg/325 mg) with codeine/APAP (30 mg/300 mg) for the management of chronic nonmalignant low back pain, osteoarthritis (OA) pain, or both in adults. Pain relief (scale, 0 = none to 4 = complete) and pain intensity (scale, 0 = none to 3 = severe) were measured 30 minutes and then hourly for 6 hours after the first daily dose each week. Patients and investigators assessed the efficacy (scale, 1 = poor to 5 = excellent) of each medication, and patients recorded daily doses of study and rescue medications. Results: A total of 462 patients (mean age, 57.6 years) were randomly assigned to treatment, with 112 (24%) reporting chronic low back pain, 162 (35%) reporting OA pain, and 188 (41%) reporting both low back and OA pain; 309 patients (67%) received tramadol/APAP and 153 (33%) received codeine/APAP. Pain relief and changes in pain intensity were comparable from day 1, as early as 30 minutes after the first dose, and lasted for at least 6 hours. Total pain relief scores (11.9 for tramadol/APAP; 11.4 for codeine/APAP) and sum of pain intensity differences (3.8 for tramadol/APAP; 3.3 for codeine/APAP) were also comparable throughout. Overall assessments of efficacy by patients (mean score 2.9 in each treatment group) and investigators (mean score 3.0 for tramadol/APAP, 2.9 for codeine/APAP) were similar for the 2 treatment groups. Equivalent mean doses (3.5 tablets or capsules daily) and maximum daily doses (5.5 tablets or 5.7 capsules) were used in the 2 treatment groups. The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable, with a significantly higher proportion of patients in the codeine/APAP group reporting somnolence (24% [37/153] vs 17% [54/309], P=0.05) or constipation (21% [32/153] vs 11% [35/309], P<0.01) and a larger proportion of patients in the tramadol/APAP group reporting headache (11% [34/309] vs 7% [11/153], P=0.08). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that tramadol/APAP tablets (37.5 mg/325 mg) are as effective as codeine/APAP capsules (30 mg/300 mg) in the treatment of chronic nonmalignant low back pain and OA pain and are better tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:1429 / 1445
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]
Altman RD, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P1905
[2]
BAKRIS GL, 1989, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V40, P199
[3]
Biasi G, 1998, INT J CLIN PHARM RES, V18, P13
[4]
Bigos S., 1994, Clinical practice guideline
[5]
Borenstein David G., 1999, Current Opinion in Rheumatology, V11, P151, DOI 10.1097/00002281-199903000-00012
[6]
COMPARISON OF AN ANTIINFLAMMATORY DOSE OF IBUPROFEN, AN ANALGESIC DOSE OF IBUPROFEN, AND ACETAMINOPHEN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE [J].
BRADLEY, JD ;
BRANDT, KD ;
KATZ, BP ;
KALASINSKI, LA ;
RYAN, SI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (02) :87-91
[7]
BRANDT KD, 1998, HARRISONS PRINCIPLES, P1935
[8]
Caldwell J, 1998, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V41, pS197
[9]
A postmarketing surveillance program to monitor Ultram® (tramadol hydrochloride) abuse in the United States [J].
Cicero, TJ ;
Adams, EH ;
Geller, A ;
Inciardi, JA ;
Muñoz, A ;
Schnoll, SH ;
Senay, EC ;
Woody, GE .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1999, 57 (01) :7-22
[10]
DALGIN PH, 1997, CLIN GERIATR MED, V5, P51