Two wildlife exposure models to assess impacts at the individual and population levels and the efficacy of remedial actions

被引:33
作者
Freshman, JS
Menzie, CA
机构
[1] Menzie-Cura and Associates, Inc., Chelmsford, MA 01824
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 1996年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
wildlife; soil; remediation; ecological risk assessment; exposure model;
D O I
10.1080/10807039609383628
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We present two models to assess wildlife exposure to chemical stressors in soils and food. The models incorporate information on the magnitude and spatial distribution of chemicals in soil, as well as the foraging area and movement of wildlife. The models assume wildlife are exposed to chemicals in contaminated food such as soil invertebrates, and that soil invertebrates bioaccumulate the chemicals from contaminated soil. The models compare an animal's exposure to a variety of measurement end points (e.g., mortality, reproductive success, and developmental effects), expressed as ''soil effects levels.'' The first model, the ''Average Concentration with Area Curve'' exposure model, is a simple graphical tool that evaluates the potential for effects to individuals that forage within the most contaminated areas of a site. The ''Population Effects Foraging'' (PEF) model evaluates the number of individuals within a local population that may be affected at a site. The PEF model limits an individual's movement based on the species' foraging area and site-specific information such as available habitat. We illustrate the models using a hypothetical hazardous waste site to demonstrate the effect of contaminant distribution on baseline conditions and remedial actions. Risk assessors can adapt the models for use with a variety of hazardous waste sites, wildlife species, and chemical stressors. Graphical presentations of the results emphasize the importance of risk presentation in conveying uncertainty to risk managers.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 498
页数:18
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
AKCAKAYA H, 1992, WILDLIFE 2001 POPULA
[2]  
AKCAKAYA HR, 1994, RAMAS GIS LINKING LA
[3]   CHAOS REDUCES SPECIES EXTINCTION BY AMPLIFYING LOCAL-POPULATION NOISE [J].
ALLEN, JC ;
SCHAFFER, WM ;
ROSKO, D .
NATURE, 1993, 364 (6434) :229-232
[4]  
DEGRAAF R, 1987, NE108 NE FOR EXP STA
[5]  
HALLAM T, 1984, DEV ENV MODELLING, V6, P13
[6]   DISPERSAL AND CONNECTIVITY IN METAPOPULATIONS [J].
HANSSON, L .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1991, 42 (1-2) :89-103
[7]   PROBABILITY OF POPULATION EXTINCTION ACCOMPANYING A TEMPORARY DECREASE OF POPULATION-SIZE [J].
IWASA, Y ;
MOCHIZUKI, H .
RESEARCHES ON POPULATION ECOLOGY, 1988, 30 (01) :145-164
[8]   ANIMAL MOVEMENTS AND POPULATION-DYNAMICS IN HETEROGENEOUS LANDSCAPES [J].
JOHNSON, AR ;
WIENS, JA ;
MILNE, BT ;
CRIST, TO .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1992, 7 (01) :63-75
[10]  
MENZIE CA, 1992, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V11, P245, DOI 10.1897/1552-8618(1992)11[245:AOMFEE]2.0.CO