Yeast cells, beer composition and mean pore diameter impacts on fouling and retention during cross-flow filtration of beer with ceramic membranes

被引:56
作者
Fillaudeau, L
Carrère, H
机构
[1] INRA, LGPTA, F-59651 Villeneuve Dascq, France
[2] INRA, LGMPA, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
关键词
cross-flow microfiltration; fouling mechanism; beer; pore diameter;
D O I
10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00568-3
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Clarification of rough beer (RB) and pasteurisation of clarified beer (CB) by cross-flow microfiltration (CFMF) stand as potential applications of membranes in the food industry. This study is based on. the comparison of the resistances to mass transfer obtained during the filtration of RB and CB. Empirical correlations made it possible to calculate the CB resistances for the same conditions of transmembrane pressure and cross-flow velocity as for the RB filtration runs. The 1.4 mum membrane led to much lower resistances than the other membranes because of the lower retention rates of the beer compounds such as proteins and polyphenols. In this case, the predominant fouling mechanism was due to the yeast cell layer which was very sensitive to cross-flow velocity. On the other hand, with the 0.1, 0.45 and 0.8 mum membranes, the retention or adsorption of the CB compounds, such as proteins and polyphenols was the predominant mechanism. The resistances obtained with the rough and CB were fairly similar. We assume that the presence of yeast cells lead to less compact proteins and polyphenols fouling. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 57
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, SEPARATIONS MEMBRANE
[2]   YEAST CAKE LAYERS AS SECONDARY MEMBRANES IN DEAD-END MICROFILTRATION OF BOVINE SERUM-ALBUMIN [J].
ARORA, N ;
DAVIS, RH .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 92 (03) :247-256
[3]  
Back W., 1992, BRAUWELT INT, V1, P42
[4]  
Bamforth CW, 1999, J AM SOC BREW CHEM, V57, P81
[5]  
BARTH, 2000, BIOS INT, V1, P46
[6]   THE BEHAVIOR OF SUSPENSIONS AND MACROMOLECULAR SOLUTIONS IN CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION [J].
BELFORT, G ;
DAVIS, RH ;
ZYDNEY, AL .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 96 (1-2) :1-58
[7]   Investigation of fouling mechanisms governing permeate flux in the crossflow microfiltration of beer [J].
Blanpain, P ;
Lalande, M .
FILTRATION + SEPARATION, 1997, 34 (10) :1065-1069
[8]   Investigation of mechanisms governing membrane fouling and protein rejection in the sterile microfiltration of beer with an organic membrane [J].
Blanpain-Avet, P ;
Fillaudeau, L ;
Lalande, M .
FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING, 1999, 77 (C2) :75-89
[9]   PROPERTIES OF MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES .2. ADSORPTION OF BOVINE SERUM-ALBUMIN AT ALUMINUM-OXIDE MEMBRANES [J].
BOWEN, WR ;
HUGHES, DT .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1990, 51 (1-2) :189-200
[10]   CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION OF BEER - LABORATORY-SCALE STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF PORE-SIZE [J].
BURRELL, KJ ;
REED, RJR .
FILTRATION & SEPARATION, 1994, 31 (04) :399-405