Aspen regeneration in the Colorado Front Range: differences at local and landscape scales

Elk (Cervus elaphus) populations in Rocky Mountain National Park are higher than at any time in the past century, and heavy browsing by elk may interfere with aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) regneration. We used aerial photographs to identify all aspen stands within Rocky Mountain National Park, and all aspen stands within the elk winter range range (defined as 2400 to 2800 m elevation) in three portions of the adjacent Roosevelt National Forest. From this population of aspen stands, we randomly selected 57 stands for evaluation of aspen regeneration. Stands that contained stems younger than 30 years and taller than 2.5 m tall were classified as regenerating successfully. Only 20% of the aspen stands in Estes Valley contained a cohort of regenerating aspen stems, whereas 45-to-75% of aspen stands across the larger landscape of the Front Range had regenerating cohorts of aspen. Within the elk winter range of the Roosevelt National Forest, 13 of 17 aspen stands were regenerating. In the elk winter range on the east side of the Park but outside of Estes Valley, 11 of 15 aspen stands were regenerating successfully. Only a few aspen stands exist in the elk winter range on the western side of the Park, and none of the five aspen stands sampled in Kawuneeche Valley had a regenerating cohort. The lack of regeneration in Kawuneeche Valley may result from locally heavy elk use in both winter and summer. In the summer elk range at higher elevations in the Park (2800 to 3200 m), 16 of 23 stands had regenerated. At landscape scales, all locations outside of the heavily impacted Estes Valley averaged about two cohorts/stand that regenerated after the mid-1960s. All stands that lacked a regenerating cohort showed evidence of moderate-to-severe damage from elk browsing of stems. No regenerating stands showed evidence of severe browsing. We conclude that at landscape scales, regeneration within aspen stands is very common across the Front Range, except in local areas of the highest elk use where little regeneration has occurred in the past 30 years.