Nickel removal from waters using surfactant-enhanced hybrid PAC/MF process. I. The influence of system-component variables

被引:23
作者
Aydiner, Coskun [1 ]
Bayramoglu, Mahmut
Kara, Serdar
Keskinler, Bulent
Ince, Orhan
机构
[1] Gebze Inst Technol, Dept Environm Engn, TR-41400 Kocaeli, Turkey
[2] Gebze Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, TR-41400 Kocaeli, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Environm Engn, TR-80626 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ie051237c
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study takes aim at exploring the effectiveness of a surfactant-added powdered activated carbon/ microfiltration (PAC/MF) hybrid process in the removal of nickel ions from water and wastewater as a promising technology. For this aim, the influence of system-component variables related to membrane material and pore size, and adsorbent and surfactant types was investigated. Nickel rejection (R-M), surfactant rejection (R-S), and steady-state flux (J*) were taken into account for more elaborately assessing the technical performance of the process. It was determined that the use of a surfactant in this process is justified only above the critical micellar concentration (CMC). Despite the increasing of nickel rejection with the addition of surfactant into the hybrid membrane process, a considerable decrease in steady-state flux is a major drawback of process. The flux decline observed was strongly dependent on surfactant type. This was interpreted as being due to a secondary membrane layer formed by surfactant micelles on the surface and within the membrane pores. The flux decline could also be related to PAC layer formation. Membrane, adsorbent, and surfactant types seem to have the highest relative influence on R-M, R-S, and J*, respectively. As a conclusion, surfactant type and membrane pore size were established as having the biggest and the smallest total influence on process performance, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:3926 / 3933
页数:8
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Treatment of primary effluent by coagulation-adsorption-ultrafiltration for reuse [J].
Abdessemed, D ;
Nezzal, G .
DESALINATION, 2003, 152 (1-3) :367-373
[2]   Phosphate removal from water by red mud using crossflow microfiltration [J].
Akay, G ;
Keskinler, B ;
Çakici, A ;
Danis, U .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (03) :717-726
[3]   Crossflow microfiltration of electrocoagulated kaolin suspension: fouling mechanism [J].
Al-Malack, MH ;
Bukhari, AA ;
Abuzaid, NS .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2004, 243 (1-2) :143-153
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, D304989 ASTM
[5]  
Antony J., 2004, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V53, P713, DOI DOI 10.1108/17410400410569125
[6]   Dynamic micellar enhanced ultrafiltration:: use of anionic (SDS)-nonionic(NPE) system to remove Cr3+ at low surfactant concentration [J].
Aoudia, M ;
Allal, N ;
Djennet, A ;
Toumi, L .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2003, 217 (1-2) :181-192
[7]  
*AWWA APHA, 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[8]   Modeling of flux decline in crossflow microfiltration using neural networks: the case of phosphate removal [J].
Aydiner, C ;
Demir, I ;
Yildiz, E .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 248 (1-2) :53-62
[9]   Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of chromate and nitrate: binding competition between chromate and nitrate [J].
Baek, K ;
Yang, JW .
DESALINATION, 2004, 167 (1-3) :111-118
[10]   Removal of nickel(II) and zinc(II) from wastewater using fly ash and impregnated fly ash [J].
Banerjee, SS ;
Jayaram, RV ;
Joshi, MV .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 38 (05) :1015-1032