Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression

被引:162
作者
Haggard, P
Whitford, B
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London WC1N 3AR, England
[2] UCL, Dept Psychol, London WC1N 3AR, England
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2004年 / 19卷 / 01期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
action; sensation; motor control; frontal lobes; human; sensorimotor integration;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.018
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Voluntary actions produce suppression of neural activity in sensory areas, and reduced levels of conscious sensation. Recent computational models of motor control have linked sensory suppression to motor prediction: an efferent signal from motor areas may cancel the sensory reafferences predicted as a consequence of movement. Direct evidence for the efferent mechanism in sensory suppression has been lacking. We investigated the perceived size of finger-muscle twitches (MEPs) evoked by TMS in eight normal subjects. Subjects freely chose on each trial whether to make or withhold a voluntary flexion of the right index finger, in synchrony with an instructional stimulus. A test MEP occurred at the instructed time of action. The subject then relaxed and a second reference MEP occurred a few seconds later. Subjects judged which of the two MEPs was larger. Subjects perceived the first test MEP to be smaller in trials where they made voluntary actions than on trials where they did not, demonstrating sensory suppression. On randomly selected trials, a conditioning prepulse was delivered over the supplementary motor area (SMA) 10 ms before the pulse producing the test MER The SMA prepulse reduced and almost abolished the sensory suppression effect in voluntary action trials. We suggest the SMA may provide an efferent signal which is used by other brain areas to modulate somatosensory activity during self-generated movement. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 58
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Abbruzzese G, 1996, EXP BRAIN RES, V111, P465
[2]   VELOCITY-DEPENDENT SUPPRESSION OF CUTANEOUS SENSITIVITY DURING MOVEMENT [J].
ANGEL, RW ;
MALENKA, RC .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1982, 77 (02) :266-274
[3]   Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation [J].
Blakemore, SJ ;
Wolpert, DM ;
Frith, CD .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 1 (07) :635-640
[4]   The time course of changes in motor cortex excitability associated with voluntary movement [J].
Chen, R ;
Hallett, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 26 (03) :163-169
[5]   A ticklish question: Does magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex give rise to an 'efference copy'? [J].
Chronicle, EP ;
Glover, J .
CORTEX, 2003, 39 (01) :105-110
[6]   DELAY IN THE EXECUTION OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT BY ELECTRICAL OR MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN - EVIDENCE FOR THE STORAGE OF MOTOR PROGRAMS IN THE BRAIN [J].
DAY, BL ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
THOMPSON, PD ;
DENOORDHOUT, AM ;
NAKASHIMA, K ;
SHANNON, K ;
MARSDEN, CD .
BRAIN, 1989, 112 :649-663
[7]  
Forss N, 2001, REV NEUROL-FRANCE, V157, P816
[8]   DAMAGE TO CEREBELLOCORTICAL PATHWAYS AFTER CLOSED-HEAD INJURY - A BEHAVIORAL AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING STUDY [J].
HAGGARD, P ;
MIALL, RC ;
WADE, D ;
FOWLER, S ;
RICHARDSON, A ;
ANSLOW, P ;
STEIN, J .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 58 (04) :433-438
[9]   Localising awareness of action with transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Haggard, P ;
Magno, E .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 127 (01) :102-107
[10]   GRASPING OBJECTS - THE CORTICAL MECHANISMS OF VISUOMOTOR TRANSFORMATION [J].
JEANNEROD, M ;
ARBIB, MA ;
RIZZOLATTI, G ;
SAKATA, H .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1995, 18 (07) :314-320