Prediction and set-dependent scaling of early postural responses in cerebellar patients

被引:70
作者
Timmann, D [1 ]
Horak, FB [1 ]
机构
[1] RS DOW NEUROL SCI INST,PORTLAND 97209,DORSET,ENGLAND
关键词
posture; cerebellum; adaptation; habituation; human;
D O I
10.1093/brain/120.2.327
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We reported previously that patients with cerebellar deficits were unable to scale the magnitude of their early automatic postural responses to the predicted amplitudes of surface translations based on central set from prior experience. The present study investigated whether this deficit in set-dependent amplitude scaling was based predominately on the cerebellar patient's disability (i) to predict perturbation amplitudes on the basis of prior experience, (ii) to scale the gain or magnitude of upcoming postural responses or (iii) to habituate postural responses. The increase in size of the early postural response when a larger than actual platform amplitude was expected and decrease when a smaller one was expected was defined as a measure of set-dependent amplitude prediction. The suppression of the postural response when the same platform velocity was repeated was used as a measure of habituation. The correlation between the size of early postural responses and platform amplitudes when presented serially, but not randomly, tested the ability to scale the gain of postural responses based on prior experience. Results show that although cerebellar patients could predict perturbation amplitudes based on prior experience, they could not use this prediction to modify precisely the gain of responses. The ability to habituate the magnitude of postural responses was not affected by cerebellar lesions. Thus, the cerebellum might not be critical for predicting upcoming events or for habituating to repented postural stimuli, although it is important for accurate timing of response gain based on prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 337
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BLOEDEL JR, 1985, CEREBELLAR FUNCTIONS, P247
[2]  
Brooks V B, 1984, Hum Neurobiol, V2, P251
[3]  
DICHGANS J, 1985, CEREBELLAR FUNCTIONS, P126
[4]   INFLUENCE OF STIMULUS PARAMETERS ON HUMAN POSTURAL RESPONSES [J].
DIENER, HC ;
HORAK, FB ;
NASHNER, LM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 59 (06) :1888-1905
[5]   THIRD STEVENSON LECTURE - CHANGING CONCEPTS OF CENTRAL CONTROL OF MOVEMENT [J].
EVARTS, EV .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1975, 53 (02) :191-201
[6]   POSTURAL RESPONSES TO CHANGING TASK CONDITIONS [J].
HANSEN, PD ;
WOOLLACOTT, MH ;
DEBU, B .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1988, 73 (03) :627-636
[7]  
HARDING AE, 1993, ADV NEUROL, V61, P1
[8]   HABITUATORY RESPONSE DECREMENT IN THE INTACT ORGANISM [J].
Harris, J. Donald .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1943, 40 (06) :385-422
[9]   CENTRAL PROGRAMMING OF POSTURAL MOVEMENTS - ADAPTATION TO ALTERED SUPPORT-SURFACE CONFIGURATIONS [J].
HORAK, FB ;
NASHNER, LM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 55 (06) :1369-1381
[10]   CEREBELLAR CONTROL OF POSTURAL SCALING AND CENTRAL SET IN STANCE [J].
HORAK, FB ;
DIENER, HC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 72 (02) :479-493