Detecting sex chromosome anomalies and common triploidies in products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization

被引:51
作者
Ballif, BC
Kashork, CD
Saleki, R
Rorem, E
Sundin, K
Bejjani, BA
Shaffer, LG
机构
[1] Signature Genom Labs LLC, Spokane, WA 99204 USA
[2] Sacred Heart Med Ctr, Spokane, WA USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Hlth Res & Educ Ctr, Spokane, WA USA
关键词
array CGH; product of conception; polyploidy; sex chromosome anomalies;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1411
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objectives In recent years, array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) has moved to the forefront of molecular cytogenetics with its ability to rapidly characterize chromosome abnormalities at resolutions much higher than routine chromosome banding. However, array CGH, like all CGH procedures, has heretofore been deemed unable to detect ploidy. a major cause of fetal demise and spontaneous miscarriage. Method We recently developed a CGH microarray that is designed for detecting aneuploidy and unbalanced chromosome rearrangements. Here, we introduce the use of a Klinefelter male cell line (47,XXY) as a control for array CGH analyses on products of conception (POCs). Results This approach facilitates the detection of common trisomies and monosomies of the sex chromosomes by reducing the analysis to the identification of single copy gains or losses. Furthermore, in a blinded study. careful interpretation of the microarray results with particular attention to the sex chromosome ratios between the patient sample and the control allowed for the detection of some common triploidies. Conclusion These results Suggest that using a chromosomally abnormal cell line in array CGH analysis can be applied to other CGH platforms and that array CGH, when properly performed and analyzed. is a powerful tool that can detect most chromosomal abnormalities observed in a clinical setting including some polyploidies. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 339
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: Is less more? [J].
Bejjani, BA ;
Saleki, R ;
Ballif, BC ;
Rorem, EA ;
Sundin, K ;
Theisen, A ;
Kashork, CD ;
Shaffer, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2005, 134A (03) :259-267
[2]   Cytogenetic diagnosis of "normal 46,XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading [J].
Bell, KA ;
Van Deerlin, PG ;
Haddad, BR ;
Feinberg, RF .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (02) :334-341
[3]   Diagnosis of aneuploidy in arrival, paraffin-embedded pregnancy-loss tissues by comparative genomic hybridization [J].
Bell, KA ;
Van Deerlin, PG ;
Feinberg, RF ;
du Manoir, S ;
Haddad, BR .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (02) :374-379
[4]   Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro [J].
Benkhalifa, M ;
Kasakyan, S ;
Clement, P ;
Baldi, M ;
Tachdjian, G ;
Demirol, A ;
Gurgan, T ;
Fiorentino, F ;
Mohammed, M ;
Qumsiyeh, MB .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (10) :894-900
[5]   Risk factors in miscarriage:: a review [J].
García-Enguídanos, A ;
Calle, ME ;
Valero, J ;
Luna, S ;
Domínguez-Rojas, V .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 102 (02) :111-119
[6]   Genetic aspects of miscarriage [J].
Goddijn, M ;
Leschot, NJ .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 14 (05) :855-865
[7]   Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas [J].
Hodgson G. ;
Hager J.H. ;
Volik S. ;
Hariono S. ;
Wernick M. ;
Moore D. ;
Albertson D.G. ;
Pinkel D. ;
Collins C. ;
Hanahan D. ;
Gray J.W. .
Nature Genetics, 2001, 29 (4) :459-464
[8]   COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION FOR MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF SOLID TUMORS [J].
KALLIONIEMI, A ;
KALLIONIEMI, OP ;
SUDAR, D ;
RUTOVITZ, D ;
GRAY, JW ;
WALDMAN, F ;
PINKEL, D .
SCIENCE, 1992, 258 (5083) :818-821
[9]   High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics [J].
Kirchhoff, M ;
Rose, H ;
Lundsteen, C .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2001, 38 (11) :740-744
[10]  
Levy B, 1998, GENET MED, V1, P4