Phase III Study of Immediate Compared With Delayed Docetaxel After Front-Line Therapy With Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

被引:300
作者
Fidias, Panos M. [1 ]
Dakhil, Shaker R.
Lyss, Alan P.
Loesch, David M.
Waterhouse, David M.
Bromund, Jane L.
Chen, Ruqin
Hristova-Kazmierski, Maria
Treat, Joseph
Obasaju, Coleman K.
Marciniak, Martin
Gill, John
Schiller, Joan H.
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Thorac Canc, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SUPPORTIVE CARE; SEQUENTIAL CHEMOTHERAPY; 1ST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY; DURATION; MULTICENTER; PACLITAXEL; CYCLES;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1405
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) is active as front-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For patients without progression, timing of second-line chemotherapy for optimum clinical benefit remains uncertain. This phase III, randomized trial assessed the efficacy and safety of docetaxel administered either immediately after GC or at disease progression. Patients and Methods The chemotherapy-nave patients enrolled had either stage IIIB NSCLC with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1 and 8 followed by carboplatin (area under the curve = 5) on day 1. After four 21-day cycles, patients who did not have progression were randomly assigned either to an immediate docetaxel group (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days, with maximum of six cycles) or to a delayed docetaxel group. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) measured from random assignment. Additional analyses included tumor response, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL). Results Enrollment totaled 566 patients; 398 patients completed GC; 309 patients were randomly assigned equally to the two docetaxel treatment groups. Toxicity profiles were generally comparable for the docetaxel groups. Median PFS for immediate docetaxel (5.7 months) was significantly greater (P = .0001) than for delayed docetaxel (2.7 months). Median OS for immediate docetaxel (12.3 months) was greater than for delayed docetaxel (9.7 months), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .0853). QOL results were not statistically different (P =. 76) between docetaxel groups. Conclusion We observed a statistically significant improvement in PFS and a nonstatistically significant increase in OS when docetaxel was administered immediately after front-line GC, without increasing toxicity or decreasing QOL.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 598
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
AGRESTI A, 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA, P230
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIN PRACT GUID ONC
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAT CANC I COMM TOX
[4]   Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation [J].
Belani, CP ;
Barstis, J ;
Perry, MC ;
La Rocca, RV ;
Nattam, SR ;
Rinaldi, D ;
Clark, R ;
Mills, GM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (15) :2933-2939
[5]   The logrank test [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7447) :1073-1073
[6]   Cisplatin and gemcitabine first-line chemotherapy followed by maintenance gemcitabine or best supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase III trial [J].
Brodowicz, T ;
Krzakowski, M ;
Zwitter, M ;
Tzekova, V ;
Ramlau, R ;
Ghilezan, N ;
Ciuleanuf, T ;
Cucevic, B ;
Gyurkovits, K ;
Ulsperger, E ;
Jassem, J ;
Grgic, M ;
Pinar, S ;
Szilasi, M ;
Wiltschke, C ;
Wagnerova, M ;
Oskina, N ;
Soldatenkova, V ;
Zielinski, C ;
Wenczl, M .
LUNG CANCER, 2006, 52 (02) :155-163
[7]  
BUCCHERI GF, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P428, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890201)63:3<428::AID-CNCR2820630305>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-V
[9]  
CARRATO A, 1998, 23 C EUR SOC MED ONC
[10]   Phase II study of first-line sequential chemotherapy with gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Chiappori, A ;
Simon, G ;
Williams, C ;
Haura, E ;
Rocha-Lima, C ;
Wagner, H ;
Bepler, G ;
Antonia, S .
ONCOLOGY, 2005, 68 (4-6) :382-390