Internal spinal fixator stiffness has only a minor influence on stresses in the adjacent discs

被引:27
作者
Rohlmann, A
Calisse, J
Bergmann, G
Weber, U
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Oskar Helene Heim, Dept Biomech, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Oskar Helene Heim, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
biomechanics; disc; finite element method; internal spinal fixator; spinal fixator stiffness; spine;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199906150-00004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Stresses in vertebral endplates and discs were calculated using the th ree-dimensional nonlinear finite-element model of a lumbar spine with an internal spinal fixation device. Objective. To determine the influence of fixator stiffness on stresses in the adjacent discs. Summary of Background Data, There are few computer models of the lumbar spine with a fixator. Most of these models neglect the muscle forces. Fixator stiffness is assumed to influence greatly the stresses in the adjacent discs. Methods. Two three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element models were used to determine stresses in the lumbar spine for standing and 60 degrees flexion of the upper body. One model had an internal spinal fixator, the other did not. In a parameter study, the diameters of the longitudinal rod of the fixator were assumed to be 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm. In the computer model, the forces of the trunk muscles were simulated. Results. The diameter of the longitudinal rod strongly affected the fixator loads but hardly influenced the stresses in the vertebral endplates. The stresses in the bridged discs were strongly reduced. However, the internal fixator had only a minor influence on the stresses in the anulus fibrosus and the pressure in the nucleus pulposus of the adjacent discs. Conclusions. The stiffness of an internal spinal fixation device has only a minor influence on stresses in the adjacent discs.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1195
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF PEDICLE SCREW FIT - AN IN-VITRO STUDY [J].
BRANTLEY, AGU ;
MAYFIELD, JK ;
KOENEMAN, JB ;
CLARK, KR .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (15) :1752-1758
[2]  
CALISSE J, 1998, THESIS BERLIN
[3]  
CALISSE J, IN PRESS J BIOMECH
[4]   AN ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MECHANICS OF SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION [J].
GOEL, VK ;
KIM, YE ;
LIM, TH ;
WEINSTEIN, JN .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (09) :1003-1011
[5]   INTERLAMINAR SHEAR STRESSES AND LAMINAE SEPARATION IN A DISC - FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE L3-L4 MOTION SEGMENT SUBJECTED TO AXIAL COMPRESSIVE LOADS [J].
GOEL, VK ;
MONROE, BT ;
GILBERTSON, LG ;
BRINCKMANN, P ;
NAT, R .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (06) :689-698
[6]  
HAY J, 1997, ANN M INT SOC STUD L, P52
[7]   SIMULTANEOUS COMBINED ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR FUSION - AN INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF A TREATMENT FOR THE DISABLED LOW-BACK-PAIN PATIENT [J].
KOZAK, JA ;
OBRIEN, JP .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (04) :322-328
[8]  
KRAG MH, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P75
[9]   3-DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRICAL AND MECHANICAL MODELING OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
LAVASTE, F ;
SKALLI, W ;
ROBIN, S ;
ROYCAMILLE, R ;
MAZEL, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 25 (10) :1153-1164
[10]  
NOLTE LP, 1993, ABSTR ISSLS, P122