Bias-corrected regularized solution to inverse ill-posed models

被引:88
作者
Shen, Yunzhong [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Peiliang [1 ]
Li, Bofeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Uji, Kyoto 6110011, Japan
[2] Tongji Univ, Dept Surveying & Geomat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Dev Tongji Univ, Ctr Spatial Informat Sci & Sustainable, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Linear ill-posed model; Bias-corrected regularization; Satellite gradiometry; Mean squared error; GENERALIZED CROSS-VALIDATION; RIDGE-REGRESSION; NONORTHOGONAL PROBLEMS; PARAMETER; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1007/s00190-012-0542-y
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
070403 [天体物理学]; 070902 [地球化学];
摘要
A regularized solution is well-known to be biased. Although the biases of the estimated parameters can only be computed with the true values of parameters, we attempt to improve the regularized solution by using the regularized solution itself to replace the true (unknown) parameters for estimating the biases and then removing the computed biases from the regularized solution. We first analyze the theoretical relationship between the regularized solutions with and without the bias correction, derive the analytical conditions under which a bias-corrected regularized solution performs better than the ordinary regularized solution in terms of mean squared errors (MSE) and design the corresponding method to partially correct the biases. We then present two numerical examples to demonstrate the performance of our partially bias-corrected regularization method. The first example is mathematical with a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind. The simulated results show that the partially bias-corrected regularized solution can improve the MSE of the ordinary regularized function by 11%. In the second example, we recover gravity anomalies from simulated gravity gradient observations. In this case, our method produces the mean MSE of 3.71 mGal for the resolved mean gravity anomalies, which is better than that from the regularized solution without bias correction by 5%. The method is also shown to successfully reduce the absolute maximum bias from 13.6 to 6.8 mGal.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 608
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1977, NEW YORK
[2]
[Anonymous], TECHNOMETRICS
[3]
NONPARAMETRIC BAYESIAN REGRESSION [J].
BARRY, D .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1986, 14 (03) :934-953
[4]
GENERALIZED CROSS-VALIDATION AS A METHOD FOR CHOOSING A GOOD RIDGE PARAMETER [J].
GOLUB, GH ;
HEATH, M ;
WAHBA, G .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) :215-223
[5]
RIDGE REGRESSION - APPLICATIONS TO NONORTHOGONAL PROBLEMS [J].
HOERL, AE ;
KENNARD, RW .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1970, 12 (01) :69-&
[6]
Application of GOCE data for regional gravity field modeling [J].
Janak, Juraj ;
Fukuda, Yoichi ;
Xu, Peiliang .
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2009, 61 (07) :835-843
[7]
Magnus J. R., 1988, WILEY SERIES PROBABI
[8]
Morozov V.A., 1984, METHODS SOLVING INCO
[9]
An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE:: EIGEN-GRACE02S [J].
Reigber, C ;
Schmidt, R ;
Flechtner, F ;
König, R ;
Meyer, U ;
Neumayer, KH ;
Schwintzer, P ;
Zhu, SY .
JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2005, 39 (01) :1-10
[10]
Schaffrin B., 1980, BOLL GEOD SCI AFF, V39, P207