Living dangerously with Bruno Latour in a hybrid world

This article critically engages with the work of Bruno Latour and, in particular, his book We Have Never Been Modern. Looking beyond the wit and brevity of Latour's writing, the article focuses on some of the non-innocent aspects of his vision of a non-modern world. Rather than completely rejecting the 'Great Divides' between Nature and Culture. Westerners and non-Westerners, Latour is seen as only interested in erasing these major fault lines of modernity in order to draw them anew. Ultimately, Latour is not asking his readers to doubt the superiority of Western science but only to understand this superiority differently - as contingent and uncertain rather than necessary and secure. Latour is not as alone as he would have us believe in bringing a non-modern world into focus and the article devotes the hulk of its attention to comparing Latour's thoughts with those governing the Euro-American discipline of international relations before and after the end of the: Cold War. Latour's particular account of the non-modem condition, it is argued, corresponds well with the shift from realism to neo-realism within international relations and the replacement of Li-polarity by global technological competition as the dominant feature of the international system. Although Latour continues to Le regularly attacked in the so-called 'Science Wars as an enemy of Western science. he actually joins forces with leading Euro-American security experts today in contending that the future of both 'Science' and the 'West' hinges on the careful monitoring and management of hybrid networks of humans and non-humans and not on uncompromising acts of 'purification' as has been the strategy in the past.