The June 2013 flood in the Upper Danube Basin, and comparisons with the 2002, 1954 and 1899 floods

被引:171
作者
Bloeschl, G. [1 ]
Nester, T. [1 ]
Komma, J. [1 ]
Parajka, J. [1 ]
Perdigao, R. A. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Hydraul Engn & Water Resources Management, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
关键词
FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; SOCIO-HYDROLOGY; RISK-MANAGEMENT; CHANGE IMPACT; CLIMATE; VARIABILITY; CIRCULATION; WATER;
D O I
10.5194/hess-17-5197-2013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The June 2013 flood in the Upper Danube Basin was one of the largest floods in the past two centuries. An atmospheric blocking situation produced precipitation exceeding 300 mm over four days at the northern rim of the Alps. The high precipitation, along with high antecedent soil moisture, gave rise to extreme flood discharges in a number of tributaries including the Tiroler Ache, Saalach, Salzach and Inn. Runoff coefficients ranged from 0.2 in the Bavarian lowlands to 0.6 in the Alpine areas in Austria. Snowfall at high altitudes (above about 1600 m a.s.l.) reduced the runoff volume produced. Precipitation was distributed over two blocks separated by a few hours, which resulted in a single peak, long-duration flood wave at the Inn and Danube. At the confluence of the Bavarian Danube and the Inn, the small time lag between the two flood waves exacerbated the downstream flood at the Danube. Because of the long duration and less inundation, there was less flood peak attenuation along the Austrian Danube reach than for the August 2002 flood. Maximum flood discharges of the Danube at Vienna were about 11 000 m(3) s(-1), as compared to 10 300, 9600 and 10 500 m(3) s(-1) in 2002, 1954 and 1899, respectively. This paper reviews the meteorological and hydrological characteristics of the event as compared to the 2002, 1954 and 1899 floods, and discusses the implications for hydrological research and flood risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:5197 / 5212
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Runoff prediction in ungauged basins: synthesis across processes, places and scales
[2]  
[Anonymous], AUG HOCHW 2005 SUDB
[3]  
BfG, 2013, 1793 BFG FED I HYDR
[4]   At what scales do climate variability and land cover change impact on flooding and low flows? [J].
Bloeschl, Guenter ;
Ardoin-Bardin, Sandra ;
Bonell, Mike ;
Dorninger, Manfred ;
Goodrich, David ;
Gutknecht, Dieter ;
Matamoros, David ;
Merz, Bruno ;
Shand, Paul ;
Szolgay, Jan .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2007, 21 (09) :1241-1247
[5]   Climate change impacts-throwing the dice? [J].
Bloeschl, Guenter ;
Montanari, Alberto .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2010, 24 (03) :374-381
[6]   Flood warning - on the value of local information [J].
Bloeschl, Guesnter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, 2008, 6 (01) :41-50
[7]  
Bloschl G., 2013, J AUSTRIAN ARCHITECT, V158, P141
[8]  
Bloschl G., 2013, Climate Vulnerability: Understanding and Addressing Threats to Essential Resources, V5, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-384703-4.00505-0
[9]  
BMU (Bundesministerium fur Umwelt Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit), 2003, HYDR ATL DEUTSCHL
[10]   Evaluating participation in water resource management: A review [J].
Carr, G. ;
Bloeschl, G. ;
Loucks, D. P. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48