Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand and wrist: Comparison of three imaging techniques

被引:85
作者
Taouli, B
Zaim, S
Peterfy, CG
Lynch, JA
Stork, A
Guermazi, A
Fan, B
Fye, KH
Genant, HK
机构
[1] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Rheumatol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.182.4.1820937
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative results from conventional high-field-strength 1.5-T MRI, 0.2-T low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and radiography to detect and grade bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Subjects and Methods. Eighteen patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent conventional high-field-strength MRI, low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and conventional radiography of both hands and wrists. Two independent reviewers searched for the presence and extent of bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis. Bone erosions (E scores) and joint-space narrowing (J scores) were evaluated at 14 and 13 sites, respectively, on conventional high-field-strength MRI, low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and radiography, using the Sharp-Genant scoring system. Synovitis (S scores) were evaluated at 13 sites on conventional high-field-strength MRI and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI. Results. For the detection of bone erosions, we found no significant difference(P=0.71) between conventional high-field-strength MRI (mean+/-SD E score, 27.5+/-9.8) and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI (28.8+/-10.0), but a significant difference (p<0.001) appeared between MRI and radiography (13.1 +/- 8.3). J scores derived from MRI (conventional high-field-strength MRI, 15.2 +/- 8.3; low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, 14.5 +/- 10.4) were higher than those derived from radiography (12.7 +/- 9.6), although the difference was not significant (p=0.70). Conventional high-field-strength MRI (S score, 35.1 +/- 8.6) and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI (30.8 +/- 10.2) were equivalent (p=0.14) for the evaluation of synovitis. The interobserver agreement for MRI scores was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.83-0.94). Conclusion. Conventional high-field-strength MRI and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI showed similar results in terms of cross-sectional grading of bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 943
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   THE AMERICAN-RHEUMATISM-ASSOCIATION 1987 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
ARNETT, FC ;
EDWORTHY, SM ;
BLOCH, DA ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
FRIES, JF ;
COOPER, NS ;
HEALEY, LA ;
KAPLAN, SR ;
LIANG, MH ;
LUTHRA, HS ;
MEDSGER, TA ;
MITCHELL, DM ;
NEUSTADT, DH ;
PINALS, RS ;
SCHALLER, JG ;
SHARP, JT ;
WILDER, RL ;
HUNDER, GG .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (03) :315-324
[2]  
Backhaus M, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V42, P1232, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1232::AID-ANR21>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-3
[4]   Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints [J].
Backhaus, M ;
Burmester, GR ;
Sandrock, D ;
Loreck, D ;
Hess, D ;
Scholz, A ;
Blind, S ;
Hamm, B ;
Bollow, M .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2002, 61 (10) :895-904
[5]  
Conaghan P, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P1158
[6]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING - EFFECTS OF MAGNETIC-FIELD STRENGTH [J].
CROOKS, LE ;
ARAKAWA, M ;
HOENNINGER, J ;
MCCARTEN, B ;
WATTS, J ;
KAUFMAN, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 151 (01) :127-133
[7]  
EMERY P, 1994, SCAND J RHEUMATOL, P3
[8]  
FOLEYNOLAN D, 1991, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V30, P101
[9]  
Gabriel SE, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V42, P415, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:3<415::AID-ANR4>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Z