Vertebral body bone strength: the contribution of individual trabecular element morphology

被引:31
作者
Parkinson, I. H. [1 ,2 ]
Badiei, A. [1 ,2 ]
Stauber, M. [3 ,5 ]
Codrington, J. [4 ]
Mueller, R. [3 ]
Fazzalari, N. L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SA Pathol & Hanson Inst, Bone & Joint Res Lab, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Anat & Pathol, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] ETH, Inst Biomech, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Adelaide, Sch Mech Engn, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[5] B Cube AG, Schlieren, Switzerland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Anisotropy; Bone strength; Spatial decomposition; Trabecular bone plates; Trabecular bone rods; MINERAL DENSITY; QUANTIFICATION; OSTEOPOROSIS; PLATES; RODS; MICROARCHITECTURE; HETEROGENEITY; DECOMPOSITION; ARCHITECTURE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-011-1832-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Although the amount of bone explains the largest amount of variability in bone strength, there is still a significant proportion unaccounted for. The morphology of individual bone trabeculae explains a further proportion of the variability in bone strength and bone elements that contribute to bone strength depending on the direction of loading. Micro-CT imaging enables measurement of bone microarchitecture and subsequently mechanical strength of the same sample. It is possible using micro-CT data to perform morphometric analysis on individual rod and plate bone trabeculae using a volumetric spatial decomposition algorithm and hence determine their contribution to bone strength. Twelve pairs of vertebral bodies (T12/L1 or L4/L5) were harvested from human cadavers, and bone cubes (10 x 10 x 10 mm) were obtained. After micro-CT imaging, a volumetric spatial decomposition algorithm was applied, and measures of individual trabecular elements were obtained. Bone strength was measured in compression, where one bone specimen from each vertebral segment was tested supero-inferiorly (SI) and the paired specimen was tested antero-posteriorly (AP). Bone volume fraction was the strongest individual determinant of SI strength (r (2) = 0.77, p < 0.0001) and AP (r (2) = 0.54, p < 0.0001). The determination of SI strength was improved to r (2) = 0.87 with the addition of mean rod length and relative plate bone volume fraction. The determination of AP strength was improved to r (2) = 0.85 with the addition of mean rod volume and relative rod bone volume fraction. Microarchitectural measures of individual trabeculae that contribute to bone strength have been identified. In addition to the contribution of BV/TV, trabecular rod morphology increased the determination of AP strength by 57%, whereas measures of trabecular plate and rod morphology increased determination of SI strength by 13%. Decomposing vertebral body bone architecture into its constituent morphological elements shows that trabecular element morphology has specific functional roles to assist in maintaining skeletal integrity.
引用
收藏
页码:1957 / 1965
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
POLYOSTOTIC HETEROGENEITY OF THE SPINE IN OSTEOPOROSIS - QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS AND 3-DIMENSIONAL MORPHOLOGY [J].
AMLING, M ;
GROTE, HJ ;
POSL, M ;
HAHN, M ;
DELLING, G .
BONE AND MINERAL, 1994, 27 (03) :193-208
[2]
[Anonymous], 2001, ACCESS EC
[3]
Influence of orthogonal overload on human vertebral trabecular bone mechanical properties [J].
Badiei, Arash ;
Bottema, Murk J. ;
Fazzalari, Nicola L. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 (11) :1690-1699
[4]
Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur-prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA [J].
Baum, T. ;
Carballido-Gamio, J. ;
Huber, M. B. ;
Mueller, D. ;
Monetti, R. ;
Raeth, C. ;
Eckstein, F. ;
Lochmueller, E. M. ;
Majumdar, S. ;
Rummeny, E. J. ;
Link, T. M. ;
Bauer, J. S. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 (09) :1553-1564
[5]
Osteoporosis: Social and Economic Impact [J].
Compston, Juliet .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 48 (03) :477-+
[6]
Analysis of bone architecture sensitivity for changes in mechanical loading, cellular activity, mechanotransduction, and tissue properties [J].
Cox, L. G. E. ;
van Rietbergen, B. ;
van Donkelaar, C. C. ;
Ito, K. .
BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2011, 10 (05) :701-712
[7]
Currey JD, 2002, BONE STRUCTURE MECH, P231
[8]
Assessment of cancellous bone quality in severe osteoarthrosis: Bone mineral density, mechanics, and microdamage [J].
Fazzalari, NL ;
Forwood, MR ;
Smith, K ;
Manthey, BA ;
Herreen, P .
BONE, 1998, 22 (04) :381-388
[9]
THE DIRECT EXAMINATION OF 3-DIMENSIONAL BONE ARCHITECTURE INVITRO BY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
FELDKAMP, LA ;
GOLDSTEIN, SA ;
PARFITT, AM ;
JESION, G ;
KLEEREKOPER, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1989, 4 (01) :3-11
[10]
Fields AJ, 2009, J BONE MINER RES, V24, P1523, DOI [10.1359/JBMR.090317, 10.1359/jbmr.090317]