Dams and downstream aquatic biodiversity: Potential food web consequences of hydrologic and geomorphic change

被引:247
作者
Power, ME [1 ]
Dietrich, WE [1 ]
Finlay, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY, DEPT GEOL & GEOPHYS, BERKELEY, CA 94270 USA
关键词
dams; food webs; hydrologic disturbance; predator-prey dynamics; succession;
D O I
10.1007/BF01205969
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Responses of rivers and river ecosystems to dams are complex and varied, as they depend on local sediment supplies, geomorphic constraints, climate, dam structure and operation, and key attributes of the biota. Therefore, ''one-size-fits-all'' prescriptions cannot substitute for local knowledge in developing prescriptions for dam structure and operation to protect local biodiversity. One general principle is self-evident: that biodiversity is best protected in rivers where physical regimes are the most natural. A sufficiently natural regime of flow variation is particularly crucial for river biota and food webs. We review our research and that of others to illustrate the ecological importance or alternating periods of low and high flow, of periodic bed scour, and of floodplain inundation and dewatering. These fluctuations regulate both the life cycles of river biota and species interactions in the food webs that sustain them. Even if the focus of biodiversity conservation efforts is on a target species rather than whole ecosystems, a food web perspective is necessary, because populations of any species depend critically on how their resources, prey, and potential predators also respond to environmental change. In regulated rivers, managers must determine how the frequency, magnitude, and timing of hydrologic events interact to constrain or support species and food webs. Simple ecological modeling, tailored to local systems, may provide a framework and some insight into explaining ecosystem response to dams and should give direction to mitigation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 895
页数:9
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   DOES BIODIVERSITY INCLUDE ARTIFICIAL DIVERSITY [J].
ANGERMEIER, PL .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 8 (02) :600-602
[2]   BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY VERSUS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AS POLICY DIRECTIVES - PROTECTING BIOTIC RESOURCES [J].
ANGERMEIER, PL ;
KARR, JR .
BIOSCIENCE, 1994, 44 (10) :690-697
[3]  
[Anonymous], RIVERS HDB
[4]  
[Anonymous], REGULATED RIVERS
[5]  
[Anonymous], REGULATED STREAMS AD
[6]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[7]  
BAIN MB, 1989, IMPORTANCE FLOODPLAI
[8]   UNDERSTANDING LARGE RIVER FLOODPLAIN ECOSYSTEMS [J].
BAYLEY, PB .
BIOSCIENCE, 1995, 45 (03) :153-158
[9]  
Brookes A, 1994, RIVERS HDB, V2, P55, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444313871.CH4
[10]   MODELING FOOD-CHAIN STRUCTURE AND CONTAMINANT BIOACCUMULATION USING STABLE NITROGEN ISOTOPES [J].
CABANA, G ;
RASMUSSEN, JB .
NATURE, 1994, 372 (6503) :255-257