Deep brain stimulation for intractable pain: A 15-year experience

被引:216
作者
Kumar, K [1 ]
Toth, C [1 ]
Nath, RK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SASKATCHEWAN,NEUROSURG SECT,DEPT SURG,PLAINS HLTH CTR,REGINA,SK,CANADA
关键词
chronic pain; deep brain electrical stimulation; periaqueductal gray matter; sensory thalamus;
D O I
10.1097/00006123-199704000-00015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: During the past 15 years, we prospectively followed 68 patients with chronic pain syndromes who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS). The objective of our study was to analyze the long-term outcomes to clarify patient selection criteria for DBS. METHODS: Patients were referred from a multidisciplinary pain clinic after conservative treatment failed. Electrodes for DBS were implanted within the periventricular gray matter, specific sensory thalamic nuclei, or the internal capsule. Each patient was followed on a 6-monthly follow-up basis and evaluated with a modified Visual analog scale. RESULTS: Follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 15 years, with an average follow-up period of 78 months. The mean age of the 54 men and 14 women in the study was 51.3 years. Indications for DBS included 43 patients with failed back syndrome, 6 with peripheral neuropathy or radiculopathy, 5 with thalamic pain, 4 with trigeminal neuropathy, 3 with traumatic spinal cord lesions, 2 with causalgic pain, 1 with phantom limb pain, and 1 with carcinoma pain. After initial screening, 53 of 68 patients (77%) elected internalization of their devices; 42 of the 53 (79%) continue to receive adequate relief of pain. Therefore, effective pain control was achieved in 42 of 68 of our initially referred patients (62%), Patients with failed back syndrome, trigeminal neuropathy, and peripheral neuropathy fared well with DBS, whereas those with thalamic pain, spinal cord injury, and postherpetic neuralgia did poorly. CONCLUSION: DBS in selected patients provides long-term effective pain control with few side effects or complications.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 746
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
ADAMS J E, 1977, Applied Neurophysiology, V40, P111
[2]   STIMULATION OF INTERNAL CAPSULE FOR RELIEF OF CHRONIC PAIN [J].
ADAMS, JE ;
HOSOBUCHI, Y ;
FIELDS, HL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1974, 41 (06) :740-744
[3]  
AKIL H, 1978, SCIENCE, V201, P468
[4]   AUTOPSY ANALYSIS OF THE SAFETY, EFFICACY AND CARTOGRAPHY OF ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE CENTRAL GRAY IN HUMANS [J].
BASKIN, DS ;
MEHLER, WR ;
HOSOBUCHI, Y ;
RICHARDSON, DE ;
ADAMS, JE ;
FLITTER, MA .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1986, 371 (02) :231-236
[5]   ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN .1. ASPECTS OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE [J].
CARLSSON, AM .
PAIN, 1983, 16 (01) :87-101
[6]  
DIECKMANN G, 1982, APPL NEUROPHYSIOL, V45, P167
[7]   CONTRAST-MEDIUM CAUSES THE APPARENT INCREASE IN BETA-ENDORPHIN LEVELS IN HUMAN CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID FOLLOWING BRAIN-STIMULATION [J].
DIONNE, RA ;
MUELLER, GP ;
YOUNG, RF ;
GREENBERG, RP ;
HARGREAVES, KM ;
GRACELY, R ;
DUBNER, R .
PAIN, 1984, 20 (04) :313-321
[8]  
Emmers R., 1975, HUMAN SOMESTHETIC TH
[9]   PAIN AFTER CORTICAL INJURY RELIEVED BY ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF INTERNAL CAPSULE [J].
FIELDS, HL ;
ADAMS, JE .
BRAIN, 1974, 97 (MAR) :169-178
[10]  
FIELDS HL, 1979, ADV PAIN RES THER, V3, P427