Immigrant earnings: Language skills, linguistic concentrations and the business cycle

被引:240
作者
Chiswick, BR
Miller, PW
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Econ MC 144, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Western Australia, Dept Econ, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
earnings; immigrants; language; business cycle; ethnic concentrations;
D O I
10.1007/PL00003838
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study of the determinants of earnings among adult foreign-born men using the 1990 Census of Population focuses on the effects of the respondent's own English language skills, the effects of living in a linguistic concentration area, and the effects of the stage of the business cycle at entry into the U.S. labor market. The analysis demonstrates the importance of English language fluency among the foreign born from non-English speaking countries. There is also strong evidence for the complementarity between language skills and other forms of human capital. Furthermore, there is strong evidence using selectivity correction techniques for the endogeneity between language and earnings.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 57
页数:27
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 9 US BUR CENS
[2]  
BARTEL A, 1991, IMMIGRATION TRADE LA
[3]   PRODUCTION OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND LIFE CYCLE OF EARNINGS [J].
BENPORATH, Y .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1967, 75 (04) :352-365
[4]  
Chiswick B., 1979, CONTEMP ECON PROBL, P359
[5]  
Chiswick B R, 1988, Res Popul Econ, V6, P183
[6]  
Chiswick Barry R., 1992, Immigration, Language and Ethnic Issues: Canada and the United States, P229
[7]   The labor market status of immigrants: Effects of the unemployment rate at arrival and duration of residence [J].
Chiswick, BR ;
Cohen, Y ;
Zach, T .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1997, 50 (02) :289-303
[8]  
CHISWICK BR, 1985, ECON REC, V61, P540
[9]   EFFECT OF AMERICANIZATION ON EARNINGS OF FOREIGN-BORN MEN [J].
CHISWICK, BR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1978, 86 (05) :897-921
[10]   THE ENDOGENEITY BETWEEN LANGUAGE AND EARNINGS - INTERNATIONAL ANALYSES [J].
CHISWICK, BR ;
MILLER, PW .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1995, 13 (02) :246-288