Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944-1985

被引:159
作者
Lounsbury, M
Rao, H
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Ind & Labor Relat, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Dept Sociol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/sof.2004.0046
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Categories are key elements of classification systems that segregate things into groups and impose coherence.. Sociologists have studied how categories shape action in a wide variety of contexts but have spent much less time investigating the sources of category durability and change. We address this gap by investigating how existing product categories are reconstituted by field-level industry media. While standard accounts of industry media suggest that existing product categories will be edited on the basis of changes in the technical features of categories, we emphasize the political nature of markets and argue that powerful producers can preserve the existing structure of categories. We test these arguments in a study of the American mutual fund industry during the period from 1945 until 1985 and outline implications for research on institutional change and the political dynamics of market classification.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 999
页数:31
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Abolafia MitchelY., 1996, MAKING MARKETS
[2]  
Aldrich H., 1979, ORG ENV
[3]  
ALDRICH H., 1999, Organizations Evolving
[4]   When market information constitutes fields: Sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry [J].
Anand, N ;
Peterson, RA .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (03) :270-284
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BLACKWELL COMPANION
[6]  
[Anonymous], CANVASSES CAREERS I, Patent No. 221001303
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Auctions: The Social Construction of Value
[8]  
[Anonymous], PRODUCTION CULTURE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1989, DIFFERENT WORLDS SOC
[10]   CULTIVATING AN INSTITUTIONAL ECOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONS - COMMENT [J].
BAUM, JAC ;
POWELL, WW .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 60 (04) :529-538