Incongruence between chloroplast and species phylogenies in Eucalyptus subgenus Monocalyptus (Myrtaceae)

被引:78
作者
McKinnon, GE
Steane, DA
Potts, BM
Vaillancourt, RE
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Plant Sci, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Cooperat Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Forestry, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
chloroplast DNA; Eucalyptus; hybridization; Myrtaceae; reticulate evolution;
D O I
10.2307/2656621
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Seventy-eight polymorphic cpDNA (chloroplast DNA) characters were found in 13 closely related taxa from Eucalyptus series Amygdalinae (subgenus Monacalyptus) and seven potential outgroup tars. The strict consensus of six cladograms generated from cpDNA data confirmed monophyly of Monocalyptus. However. cpDNA phylogeny within Monocalyptus was incongruent with taxonomic classification, being more related to geography, even when accessions were from divergent series. Monocalyptus cpDNA formed two major clades. On the island of Tasmania cpDNA was restricted to a single clade, exhibited very little variation; and was phylogenetically related to cpDNA found in central and western Victoria. In contrast. cpDNA of mainland monocalypt taxa was more variable, even within the Amygdalinae. Four out of six Tasmanian Amygdalinae species were polymorphic. The difference between cpDNA of replicates was often greater than differences between species from different series. The low level of cpDNA variation and extensive morphological intergradation between the Tasmanian endemics suggest recent speciation. However, the transfer of cpDNA through hybridization between lineages is the most likely explanation for the observed sharing of cpDNA across series. This study highlights that the geographical pattern to cpDNA variation in Eucalyptus may be an important source of information on past plant distributions in Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:1038 / 1046
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   RESTRICTION MAP AND MATERNAL INHERITANCE OF CHLOROPLAST DNA IN EUCALYPTUS-NITENS [J].
BYRNE, M ;
MORAN, GF ;
TIBBITS, WN .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1993, 84 (03) :218-220
[2]  
Chippendale G.M., 1988, FLORA AUSTR, V19, P542
[3]  
DumolinLapegue S, 1997, GENETICS, V146, P1475
[4]  
JOHNSON L A S, 1990, Telopea, V4, P37
[5]   PROBLEMS OF SPECIES AND GENERA IN EUCALYPTUS (MYRTACEAE) [J].
JOHNSON, LAS .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 1976, 125 (03) :155-167
[6]  
KIRKPATRICK JB, 1984, SEARCH, V15, P112
[7]  
KIRKPATRICK JB, 1996, REFUGIAL SITES FLORA
[8]  
Ladiges Pauline Y., 1997, P16
[9]   CLADISTIC AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE BLUE ASH EUCALYPTS [J].
LADIGES, PY ;
PROBER, SM ;
NELSON, G .
CLADISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE WILLI HENNIG SOCIETY, 1992, 8 (02) :103-124
[10]   CLADISTIC RELATIONSHIPS AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN THE PEPPERMINT GROUP OF EUCALYPTUS (INFORMAL SUBSERIES AMYGDALININAE, SUBGENUS MONOCALYPTUS) AND THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES, EUCALYPTUS WILLISII [J].
LADIGES, PY ;
HUMPHRIES, CJ ;
BROOKER, MIH .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1983, 31 (06) :565-584