共 18 条
Treatment of gingival recession defects with a coronally advanced flap and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
被引:136
作者:
Jepsen, Karin
[1
]
Jepsen, Soren
[1
]
Zucchelli, Giovanni
[2
]
Stefanini, Martina
[2
]
de Sanctis, Massimo
[3
]
Baldini, Nicola
[3
]
Greven, Bjoern
Heinz, Bernd
Wennstrom, Jan
[4
]
Cassel, Bjorn
[4
]
Vignoletti, Fabio
[5
]
Sanz, Mariano
[2
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Periodontol, D-53111 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Stomatol, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Siena, Dept Periodontol, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Periodontol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Univ Madrid, Dept Periodontol, Madrid 3, Spain
关键词:
collagen (matrix);
gingival recession;
keratinized tissue;
root coverage;
tissue regeneration;
xenograft;
CONNECTIVE-TISSUE GRAFT;
AFFECTED ROOT SURFACES;
COVERAGE;
DESIGN;
EDTA;
D O I:
10.1111/jcpe.12019
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要:
Aim To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the use of a xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) in combination with the coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of localized recession defects. Material & Methods In a multicentre single-blinded, randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial, 90 recessions (Miller I, II) in 45 patients received either CAF + CM or CAF alone. Results At 6 months, root coverage (primary outcome) was 75.29% for test and 72.66% for control defects (p = 0.169), with 36% of test and 31% of control defects exhibiting complete coverage. The increase in mean width of keratinized tissue (KT) was higher in test (from 1.97 to 2.90 mm) than in control defects (from 2.00 to 2.57 mm) (p = 0.036). Likewise, test sites had more gain in gingival thickness (GT) (0.59 mm) than control sites (0.34 mm) (p = 0.003). Larger (>= 3 mm) recessions (n = 35 patients) treated with CM showed higher root coverage (72.03% versus 66.16%, p = 0.043), as well as more gain in KT and GT. Conclusions CAF + CM was not superior with regard to root coverage, but enhanced gingival thickness and width of keratinized tissue when compared with CAF alone. For the coverage of larger defects, CAF + CM was more effective.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 89
页数:8
相关论文

