Biosolids - A fuel or a waste? An integrated appraisal of five co-cornhustion scenarios with policy analysis

被引:66
作者
Cartmell, E
Gostelow, P
Riddell-Black, D
Simms, N
Oakey, J
Morris, J
Jeffrey, P
Howsam, P
Pollard, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Ind Mfg Sci, Sustainable Syst Dept, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Lupus Sci, Nuffield RG9 5GS, Oxon, England
[3] Cranfield Univ, Inst Water & Environm, Bedford MK45 4DT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es052181g
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An integrated appraisal of five technology scenarios for the co-combustion of biosolids in the UK energy and waste management policy context is presented. Co-combustion scenarios with coal, municipal solid waste, wood, and for cement manufacture were subject to thermodynamic and materials flow modeling and evaluated by 19 stakeholder representatives. All scenarios provided a net energy gain (0.58-5.0 kWh/kg dry solids), having accounted for the energy required for transportation and sludge drying. Co-combustion within the power generation and industrial (e.g., cement) sectors is most readily implemented but provides poor water utility control, and it suffers from poor public perception. Co-combustion with wastes or biomass appears more sustainable but requires greater investment and presents significant risks to water utilities. Incongruities within current energy and waste management policy are discussed and conclusions for improved understanding are drawn.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 658
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CM5761
[2]  
[Anonymous], OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L
[4]  
CLARKE LB, 1992, CR49 INT EN AG COAL
[5]  
*DEP ENV TRANSP RE, 1998, RAIS QUAL GUID DIR G
[6]  
*DIRK GROUP, SLUDG COOMB COST EFF
[7]  
DUGWELL D, 2000, THERMAL METHODS PRED
[8]  
*EN RES CTR, PHYL DAT BIOM WAST
[9]  
ENRIGHT JF, 2004, BIODEGRADABLE RESIDU, P311
[10]  
Eriksson J, 2001, 5159 SWED ENV PROT A