An antibiotic order form intervention does not improve or reduce vancomycin use

被引:16
作者
Bolon, MK [1 ]
Arnold, AD
Feldman, HA
Goldmann, DA
Wright, SB
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp, Dept Pharm, Clin Res Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
vancomycin; drug utilization review; practice guidelines; UNIVERSITY MEDICAL-CENTER; ADVISORY-COMMITTEE GUIDELINES; RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCI; RESTRICTION POLICY; HONG-KONG; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; PATTERNS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1097/01.inf.0000190025.61037.6c
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine whether a paper-based antibiotic ordering system is an effective antibiotic stewardship measure. Methods: An antibiotic order form (AOF) was introduced in July 2001 at a pediatric tertiary care hospital. Vancomycin courses prescribed before and after the AOF introduction were retrospectively reviewed based on Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee guidelines. The impact of the AOF on the appropriateness of vancomycin prescribing was evaluated in univariate and multivariable analyses that adjusted for other factors associated with appropriateness of vancomycin use. The density of vancomycin use after introduction of the AOF was also assessed. Results: Compliance with the AOF was poor (< 50%) during the planned study period; therefore an additional 2 months of improved compliance (70-80%) were included. Rates of inappropriate vancomycin use increased during the study periods: 35% before AOF; 39% post-AOF; and 51% during the improved compliance period. On adjusted analysis, vancomycin utilization was significantly more inappropriate after introduction of the AOF. Vancomycin doses per 1000 patient days increased after introduction of the AOF. Conclusions: Inappropriate vancomycin use and vancomycin use overall increased after the introduction of an AOF An AOF intervention did not have its intended effect of improving and reducing vancomycin use.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1058
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ayuthya Sasima Kusuma Na, 2003, Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, V34, P179
[2]   Restriction of vancomycin use at a university hospital in Thailand [J].
Ayuthya, SKN ;
Malathum, K ;
Matangkasombut, OP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2003, 60 (10) :1053-1054
[3]  
Beidas S, 1996, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V17, P773
[4]   Evaluating vancomycin use at a pediatric hospital: New approaches and insights [J].
Bolon, MK ;
Arnold, AD ;
Feldman, HA ;
Rehkopf, DH ;
Strong, EF ;
Goldmann, DA ;
Wright, SB .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (01) :47-55
[5]   Vancomycin in Oregon: Who's using it and why [J].
Cieslak, PR ;
Strausbaugh, LJ ;
Fleming, DW ;
Ling, JM .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (08) :557-560
[6]  
Drinkovic D, 1999, NEW ZEAL MED J, V112, P336
[7]  
Evans ME, 1996, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V17, P356
[8]   Vancomycin use in a university medical center: Effect of a vancomycin continuation form [J].
Evans, ME ;
Millheim, ET ;
Rapp, RP .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (06) :417-420
[9]   An interventional program to improve antibiotic use [J].
Feucht, CL ;
Rice, LB .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 37 (05) :646-651
[10]   Monitoring antimicrobial use and resistance: Comparison with a national benchmark on reducing vancomycin use and vancomycin-resistant enterococci [J].
Fridkin, SK ;
Lawton, R ;
Edwards, JR ;
Tenover, FC ;
McGowan, JE ;
Gaynes, RP .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 8 (07) :702-707