Building participative library services: the impact of social software use in public libraries

被引:28
作者
Rutherford, Louise L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
Public libraries; Innovation; Internet; Computer software; Social networks;
D O I
10.1108/07378830810903337
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 [信息资源管理]; 120501 [图书馆学];
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the adoption of social software in public libraries and to explore its impact. Design/methodology/approach - This research uses a qualitative methodology and took the form of open-ended interview questions using all e-mail format. The research uses Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory as framework. Findings - This research found that participants consistently described social software as a means to deliver a library service that truly reflected their users wants and needs. Participants indicated that social software would help achieve this goal in two ways. Firstly, participants felt that social software enabled users to interact with the library in the ways they, wanted to. Secondly, the participative elements Of social software made it easier for users to provide feedback Oil all aspects of the library service. The study also revealed that while social software is not currently being used to its fullest extent in public libraries. public librarians are exploring the meaning and potential of this new technology. Originality/value - This paper advances the discussion on social software by providing concrete examples of its impact in practice. It is a resource, for public librarians considering the potential impact of implementing social software in their own library which will allow them to learn from the experiences of others.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 423
页数:13
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
[Anonymous], COMPUTERS LIB
[2]
[Anonymous], 2005, ARIADNE
[3]
CASEY M, 2006, LIB J, V131
[4]
CHAD K, 2005, DO LIB MATTER
[5]
CHASE D, 2007, COMPUTERS LIB, V27, P7
[6]
Public library 2.0 - Towards a new mission for public libraries as a "network of community knowledge" [J].
Chowdhury, Gobinda ;
Poulter, Alan ;
McMenemy, David .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2006, 30 (04) :454-460
[7]
Crawford W., 2006, CITES INSIGHTS, V6
[8]
Creswell J.W., 2014, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, V4th, DOI DOI 10.5539/ELT.V12N5P40
[9]
DAMES MK, 2004, FEATURES SOCIAL STRU
[10]
ETCHESJOHNSON A, 2006, FELICITER, V52, P56