The Quadruple Process model approach to examining the neural underpinnings of prejudice

被引:85
作者
Beer, Jennifer S. [1 ]
Stallen, Mirre [2 ,3 ]
Lombardo, Michael V. [4 ]
Gonsalkorale, Karen [7 ]
Cunningham, William A. [6 ]
Sherman, Jeffrey W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Erasmus Univ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[7] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.033
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In order to investigate the systems underlying the automatic and controlled processes that support social attitudes, we conducted an fMRI study that combined an implicit measure of race attitudes with the Quadruple Process model (Quad model). A number of previous neural investigations have adopted the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to examine the automatic processes that contribute to social attitudes. Application of the Quad model builds on this previous research by permitting measures of distinct automatic and controlled processes that contribute to performance on the IAT. The present research found that prejudiced attitudes of ingroup favoritism were associated with amygdala, medial and right lateral orbitofrontal cortex. In contrast, prejudiced attitudes of outgroup negativity were associated with caudate and left lateral orbitofrontal cortex. Frontal regions found in previous neural research on the IAT, such as anterior cingulate, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and operculum were associated with detecting appropriate responses in situations in which they conflict with automatic associations. Insula activity was associated with attitudes towards ingroup and outgroup members, as well as detecting appropriate behavior. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 783
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: The role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control [J].
Amodio, David M. ;
Devine, Patricia G. ;
Harmon-Jones, Eddie .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 94 (01) :60-74
[2]   Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling [J].
Batchelder, WH ;
Riefer, DM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1999, 6 (01) :57-86
[3]   The amygdala and reward [J].
Baxter, MG ;
Murray, EA .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (07) :563-573
[4]   Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update [J].
Botvinick, Matthew M. ;
Cohen, Jonathan D. ;
Carter, Cameron S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (12) :539-546
[5]  
Brett M, 2002, REGION INTEREST ANAL
[6]   Facial expressions and complex IAPS pictures: Common and differential networks [J].
Britton, Jennifer C. ;
Taylor, Stephan F. ;
Sudheimer, Keith D. ;
Liberzon, Israel .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 31 (02) :906-919
[7]  
Chee MWL, 2000, NEUROREPORT, V11, P135
[8]   Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance [J].
Conrey, FR ;
Sherman, JW ;
Gawronski, B ;
Hugenberg, K ;
Groom, CJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 89 (04) :469-487
[9]   Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces [J].
Cunningham, WA ;
Johnson, MK ;
Raye, CL ;
Gatenby, JC ;
Gore, JC ;
Banaji, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (12) :806-813
[10]   Affective flexibility - Evaluative processing goals shape amygdala activity [J].
Cunningham, William A. ;
Van Bavel, Jay J. ;
Johnsen, Ingrid R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (02) :152-160