Comparative economic analysis of perennial, annual, and intercrops for biomass production

被引:109
作者
Hallam, A
Anderson, IC
Buxton, DR
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] ARS, USDA, NPS, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
energy crops; production costs; annual; perennial; intercrops; switchgrass; big bluestem; sorghum;
D O I
10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00051-4
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Herbaceous crops may be an important source of renewable energy. Production costs can be more competitive by increasing yields so that overhead costs are applied to more biomass. Most previous economic studies of energy crops have concentrated on the production of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). This study analyzes the biomass yield and economic potential of several high-yielding annual and perennial crops on prime and marginal, sloping land. Crops evaluated were reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) harvested twice per year; switchgrass and big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman var. gerardii); alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.); and sweet sorghum, forage sorghum [both Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and maize (Zea mays L.). The intercropping of the two sorghum species into reed canarygrass and alfalfa was also analyzed. All crops but alfalfa were fertilized with 0, 70, 140, or 280 kg N ha(-1), with economic analysis performed assuming 140 ka N ha(-1). Sorghums were most productive, with more than 16 t of dry matter ha(-1). Switchgrass was the highest-yielding perennial crop, Costs per ton of biomass produced were lowest for sorghum, somewhat higher for switchgrass, higher still for big bluestem, and highest for alfalfa and reed canarygrass. Yields per ton for intercropped species were higher than for perennial species but lower than for monocrop sorghum. Costs per ton for intercropped species were less than for either alfalfa or reed canarygrass, but were higher than costs per ton of monocrop sorghum. Although the sorghums had the highest yields, high potential for erosion on sloping soils may preclude their use on these soils. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 424
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AHEARN MC, 1992, COSTS RETURNS AGR CO
[2]   A systems approach for the evaluation of ethanol production based on forages [J].
Alvo, P ;
Savoie, P ;
Tremblay, D ;
Emond, JP ;
Turcotte, G .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 56 (01) :61-68
[3]  
*AM SOC AGR ENG, 1998, EP4962 ASAE
[4]  
ANDERSON IC, 1999, PERFORMANCE ANN PERE
[5]   COMPARATIVE GROWTH ANALYSIS OF COOL-SEASON AND WARM-SEASON GRASSES IN A COOL-TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT [J].
BELESKY, DP ;
FEDDERS, JM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1995, 87 (05) :974-980
[6]  
BHAT MG, 1992, LIQUID FUELS RENEWAB
[7]  
Boehlje MichaelD., 1984, FARM MANAGEMENT
[8]   Intercropping sorghum into alfalfa and reed canarygrass to increase biomass yield [J].
Buxton, DR ;
Anderson, IC ;
Hallam, A .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1998, 11 (04) :481-486
[9]   Performance of sweet and forage sorghum grown continuously, double-cropped with winter rye, or in rotation with soybean and maize [J].
Buxton, DR ;
Anderson, IC ;
Hallam, A .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1999, 91 (01) :93-101
[10]  
EIDMAN VE, 1998, COMMODITY COSTS RETU